1999
DOI: 10.1016/s1056-8719(99)00040-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new method for recording surface compound potentials in sympathetic ganglia from mouse, rat, and guinea pig—application to muscarinic and nicotinic depolarizations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present experimental scheme, we used acetylcholine as cholinergic agonist because it is considered to be the classical preganglionic neurotransmitter of the sympathetic ganglionic pathway (Eccles & Libet 1961, Berthoud & Powley 1993. Carbacol was not used because it is a synthetic cholinergic agonist that, though more stable than acetylcholine, has activity only on a specific type of cholinergic receptors (Schroff et al 1999), and our purpose in this work is always to emulate in an ex vivo system of the physiological conditions. Besides, the use of carbacol in other experimental schemes has shown a response with the physiological agonist higher than expected (Miller et al 1997, Ghisdal et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present experimental scheme, we used acetylcholine as cholinergic agonist because it is considered to be the classical preganglionic neurotransmitter of the sympathetic ganglionic pathway (Eccles & Libet 1961, Berthoud & Powley 1993. Carbacol was not used because it is a synthetic cholinergic agonist that, though more stable than acetylcholine, has activity only on a specific type of cholinergic receptors (Schroff et al 1999), and our purpose in this work is always to emulate in an ex vivo system of the physiological conditions. Besides, the use of carbacol in other experimental schemes has shown a response with the physiological agonist higher than expected (Miller et al 1997, Ghisdal et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, afferent input to the ganglia, arising from cardiac and extracardiac anatomical structures, affects the electrical activity of various neuronal populations in the ganglia. These conclusions derive from data accumulated in electrophysiological animal studies performed in vitro [12,24], in situ [4,5,9,13] and in vivo [3,8], which examined the autonomic ganglia activity in relation to cardiovascular and respiratory functions. In these studies, the electrical activity obtained from individual autonomic ganglia cells was recorded using intracellular microelectrodes [3,8,9,13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%