2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.09.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new method for progressive collapse analysis of steel frames

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Robustness against possible failure of elements in the bridge's main latticework was also studied by recreating artificially failures in the main trusses. The aim was thus, not to determine the causes of possible crack initiation and propagation, but to determine the consequences of a local element failure, known as the scenario-independent approach [7][8][9][10], widely used to study progressive or disproportionate structural collapse after a local failure. This method can evaluate structural robustness understood as insensitivity to or propagation of a local failure.…”
Section: Robustness: Experimental and Numerical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robustness against possible failure of elements in the bridge's main latticework was also studied by recreating artificially failures in the main trusses. The aim was thus, not to determine the causes of possible crack initiation and propagation, but to determine the consequences of a local element failure, known as the scenario-independent approach [7][8][9][10], widely used to study progressive or disproportionate structural collapse after a local failure. This method can evaluate structural robustness understood as insensitivity to or propagation of a local failure.…”
Section: Robustness: Experimental and Numerical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further investigate the behavior of steel sub-frames with RBS against progressive collapse, FE models using explicit software LS-DYNA [41] were employed due to its numerical stability and variety of constitutive models [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50]. Many other software has been used in progressive collapse analysis [51], however, it is found that LS-DYNA is one of the most powerful software.…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis results showed the dynamic response of the removed member under the seismic load is entirely dependent on the seismic characteristics such as the energy applied to the structure, the maximum ground acceleration, and the frequency content. Lin et al [16] presented a new method for evaluating steel momentresisting frames against blast loads. This method was compared with other common methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%