1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf02393838
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new method for predicting vegetation distributions using decision tree analysis in a geographic information system

Abstract: / Decision tree analysis was used to predict the distribution of forest communities in an area on the south coast of New South Wales. Australia, The analysis was carried out using a geographical information system environmental data base of those topographic and geological variables thought to influence the distribution of vegetation and derived from cartographic sources. The resulting maps of forest communities are of a resolution sufficient to delimit individual forest stands and contain much ecological info… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
76
0
5

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
76
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This secondary topographic attribute is highly variable from place to place due to changing slope and aspect [17,18,44]. In the present study, the decisive condition shaping the energy amounts delivered for both riverbanks was the almost parallel course of the valley in a greater part of the analyzed fragment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…This secondary topographic attribute is highly variable from place to place due to changing slope and aspect [17,18,44]. In the present study, the decisive condition shaping the energy amounts delivered for both riverbanks was the almost parallel course of the valley in a greater part of the analyzed fragment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…In this strategy, also known as 'predict first, classify later' and 'classification-then-modelling' Davis & Goetz (1990), Franklin & Wilson (1991), Lees & Ritman (1991), Moore et al (1991), Fitzgerald & Lees (1992), Brzeziecki et al (1993), Brown (1994), Brzeziecki et al (1995), Lewis (1998), Zimmermann & Kienast (1999), Keith & Bedward (1999), Hilbert & Ostendorf (2001), Ferrier et al (2002) 1b. Modelling of pre-derived species groups McKenzie et al (1989), Bojórquez-Tapia et al (1995), Ferrier et al (2002) 1c.…”
Section:  2:    mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A priori probabilities of a forest-type occurring on a topographic position were chosen by expert foresters, rather than induced from sampling O n the other hand, CAIRNS (2001) prefers an approach in which the vegetation model is strictly induced from a training set: general linear models (GLM), artificial neural networks (ANN) and induced classification trees are compared as predictors of vegetation type along the alpine timberline. MOORE et al (1991) also used machine-learning approaches (CART: classification and regression trees) to vegetation mapping in GIS. -FRANKLIN (2002) used classification-trees obtained from a trainine set of 906 plots, kheré pedictive variables were drawn from a DEM a l d from climate information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%