2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new method for 3D individual tree extraction using multispectral airborne LiDAR point clouds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
75
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
75
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to monochromatic wavelength lidar points, the algorithm was also employed for multispectral airborne lidar data by Dai et al [28], who firstly segmented the trees only in the spatial domain, then the SVM was used to detect those which had been undersegmented, which were then refined by a second round of mean shift segmentation, considering the multispectral domain. The cylindrical kernel followed the same design as in [24], apart from an extra weight on higher points in the kernel, which guided the kernel to move upwards.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition to monochromatic wavelength lidar points, the algorithm was also employed for multispectral airborne lidar data by Dai et al [28], who firstly segmented the trees only in the spatial domain, then the SVM was used to detect those which had been undersegmented, which were then refined by a second round of mean shift segmentation, considering the multispectral domain. The cylindrical kernel followed the same design as in [24], apart from an extra weight on higher points in the kernel, which guided the kernel to move upwards.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The kernel can be easily expanded into 3D, so the mean can be calculated directly from the 3D points. It has shown promising results for different types of tree conditions, such as multi-layered temperate [24] and tropical forests [26], mixed-species urban trees [27], and boreal coniferous forest [28]. However, there are a few factors to be considered, such as the kernel shape, size, and weight, to better implement it to segment trees.As an in depth analysis of the kernel function and weighting are inadequate from the literature, this paper aims at providing a detailed assessment of the mean shift algorithm for ITD from airborne lidar data to clarify the influence of the variations to the performance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Current tree segmentation approaches are primarily based on user-defined algorithms that describe the appearance of trees in a hierarchical sequence of rules. These rule-based approaches rely on combinations of shape features (Gomes et al, 2018), template matching (Dai et al, 2018), network analysis (Williams et al, 2019), and watershed routines (Silva et al, 2016) that are applied to either LIDAR point clouds or RGB photogrammetric imagery (Brieger et al, 2019). By describing the parameters that define an individual tree, unsupervised algorithms attempt to match these rules when predicting unlabeled data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the field of computer vision, there has been a broad shift away from rule-based approaches (i.e., user-designed features) towards approaches that learn features from data using deep learning neural networks (Agarwal et al, 2018). There have been few attempts to use learned features in tree detection (Dai et al, 2018) due to the need for a large amounts of labeled training data, which is often difficult or impossible to collect in ecological contexts. Overall, generalization of deep learning algorithms across applications in airborne remote sensing remains a challenging task (Zhu et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%