2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.camwa.2015.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new learning function for Kriging and its applications to solve reliability problems in engineering

Abstract: a b s t r a c tIn structural reliability, an important challenge is to reduce the number of calling the performance function, especially a finite element model in engineering problem which usually involves complex computer codes and requires time-consuming computations. To solve this problem, one of the metamodels, Kriging is then introduced as a surrogate for the original model. Kriging presents interesting characteristics such as exact interpolation and a local index of uncertainty on the prediction which ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
89
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 259 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The learning function U, proposed by Echard et al [34], focuses on the probability of misclassification made by the Kriging model on the sign of ( ) x G . Just like discussed in [41], U gives more weight to points in the vicinity of the predicted limit state rather than the Kriging variance, which is its main difference from EFF. Lv et al [41] and Yang et al [42,43] present two new learning functions which are named H and expected risk function (ERF) respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The learning function U, proposed by Echard et al [34], focuses on the probability of misclassification made by the Kriging model on the sign of ( ) x G . Just like discussed in [41], U gives more weight to points in the vicinity of the predicted limit state rather than the Kriging variance, which is its main difference from EFF. Lv et al [41] and Yang et al [42,43] present two new learning functions which are named H and expected risk function (ERF) respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…An excellent strategy of DoE leads the process of reliability analysis converging quickly and provides high accuracy at the same time [31,34,[38][39][40]. Various kinds of sequential DoE based on the Kriging model have been proposed to improve the accuracy of structural reliability analysis and reduce the number of calls to the real performance function [8,29,32,38,41,42]. Kriging based sequential DoE has drawn more and more attention because it is often active and can update itself by adding new sample point based on the statistical information provided by the Kriging model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al [21]. Other methods have also been presented to address specific problems such as small failure probabilities (rare events) estimations [3,22,23,24,25,7,26] , multiple failure regions problems [27,28,29,30] or systems failure probabilities assessment [6,31,5,2,9,32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…erefore, Kriging-based sequential strategies of the design of experiments (DoE) have drawn more and more attention because it is an active learning process and can update itself by adding new training point based on the statistical information provided by the Kriging model. So far, several Kriging-based reliability methods with an adaptive DoE have been proposed utilizing the Kriging variance [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%