2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2020.102064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new image dataset for the evaluation of automatic fingerlings counting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Garcia et al [13] have already published preliminary results on the evaluation of the fingerling counter through its exploration of parameters. The best performance was obtained with an MSE of 2.65 and R squared 0.9803.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Garcia et al [13] have already published preliminary results on the evaluation of the fingerling counter through its exploration of parameters. The best performance was obtained with an MSE of 2.65 and R squared 0.9803.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equipment responsible for the fingerling counting, was developed in [13], and basically consists of 4 main components: the structure, the lighting, the camera and the software. The structure is assembled in a way that it is inclined, around 11 to 13 degrees, through which the fingerlings slide with the help of water, which flows continuously.…”
Section: A Fingerling Countermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 2019, Albuquerque et al proposed an automatic counting system [6] combining point detection, Gaussian mixture, and Kalman filter, which used the background difference method to detect fry, and the Kalman filter to reduce the error due to fish overlap. They also proposed a test dataset in 2020 [7]. Due to the excellent performance of the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) in object detection and tracking, in 2019, Lainez and Gonzales [8] tested the effectiveness of CNN-based in fish detection and counting accuracy on tilapia of four sizes and set different thresholds for different numbers of fish species present.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional machine learning-based counting methods use techniques such as image segmentation, which requires the human extraction of features, manual setting of thresholds, and setting of regression functions to perform counting. Researchers like Ibrahin et al [18], Albuquerque et al [19], Zhang et al [20], and Garcia et al [21] adopted traditional computer vision processing methods such as speckle detection and edge contour extraction to achieve the automatic counting of fry. Researchers such as Zhang et al [22] further utilized binarization and expansion erosion to determine the biomass of fry through independently refined connected domains, improving the accuracy of overlapping regions to some extent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%