1997
DOI: 10.1006/jcht.1997.0211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new evaluation of (p, ρ,T) measurements on steam with corrections for the effects of physical and chemical adsorption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hendl et al 7 reevaluated older data from their laboratory and derived adsorption-corrected values for B between 381 and 524 K. Their results, while internally consistent, for the most part disagree with the studies mentioned previously; we will discuss this disagreement in a subsequent section.…”
Section: Data For B From Pvt Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Hendl et al 7 reevaluated older data from their laboratory and derived adsorption-corrected values for B between 381 and 524 K. Their results, while internally consistent, for the most part disagree with the studies mentioned previously; we will discuss this disagreement in a subsequent section.…”
Section: Data For B From Pvt Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…1 is the inconsistency of the data of Hendl et al 7 with the other data sources. Because the other three independent sources are in fairly good agreement, and because the B(T) function could not be made to agree with Hendl et al 7 without drastically worsening the prediction of °shown in Fig. 2, we disregarded these data.…”
Section: Low Temperaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The re-evaluation will be used for developing a new analytical representation of second virial coefficient as a function of the internal energy. As the earlier step a following function was developed Developed model is compared with the re-evaluated data, previously published virial coefficients by Adulagatov et al [16], Eubank et al [17], Hendl et al [18], Kell et al [19] and [20] and with previous models: IAPWS95 [4], Hill and MacMillan [21] and Le Fevre et al [22] as can be seen from figure 6 for lower internal energy of ideal gas and from figure 7 for higher one.…”
Section: A B T B Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be seen, there are far less experimental data available for the CO 2 -H 2 O-NaCl system than those for the CO 2 -H 2 O system. (Abdulagatov et al, 2002;Harvey and Lemmon, 2004;Hendl et al, 1997;Holste et al, 1987;Plyasunov and Shock, 2003;Tsonopouplos, 1974) to predict the thermophysical properties of CO 2 -H 2 O at low to medium pressures. The data generated using these correlations, however, deviate from experimental results rapidly with pressure.…”
Section: Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%