2010
DOI: 10.1090/s0025-5718-10-02360-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new error analysis for discontinuous finite element methods for linear elliptic problems

Abstract: Abstract. The standard a priori error analysis of discontinuous Galerkin methods requires additional regularity on the solution of the elliptic boundary value problem in order to justify the Galerkin orthogonality and to handle the normal derivative on element interfaces that appear in the discrete energy norm. In this paper, a new error analysis of discontinuous Galerkin methods is developed using only the H k weak formulation of a boundary value problem of order 2k. This is accomplished by replacing the Gale… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
164
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(41 reference statements)
2
164
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…also [16,18], for example. An alternative proof of convergence for a range of (standard) DG methods, under minimal regularity assumptions, is presented by Gudi [13]; this is based on exploiting ideas from the a posteriori error analysis of DG methods. The analysis of the proposed DGCFEM in this setting will be investigated in the forthcoming article [12].…”
Section: A1429mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…also [16,18], for example. An alternative proof of convergence for a range of (standard) DG methods, under minimal regularity assumptions, is presented by Gudi [13]; this is based on exploiting ideas from the a posteriori error analysis of DG methods. The analysis of the proposed DGCFEM in this setting will be investigated in the forthcoming article [12].…”
Section: A1429mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The medius analysis of [15,25] proves for the discrete solution u CR ∈ CR (T) to (3.8) the best-approximation result…”
Section: Medius Analysismentioning
confidence: 91%
“…We have followed the classical line for the error analysis to keep the presentation of the method simpler. Of course one might consider the extension of the results in [25] to estimate the nonconformity error arising in the nonconforming virtual approximation. We wish to note though, that such extension will require to have laid for virtual elements, some results on a-posteriori error estimation.…”
Section: Error Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%