2016
DOI: 10.1051/m2an/2015090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The nonconforming virtual element method

Abstract: Abstract. We introduce the nonconforming Virtual Element Method (VEM) for the approximation of second order elliptic problems. We present the construction of the new element in two and three dimensions, highlighting the main differences with the conforming VEM and the classical nonconforming finite element methods. We provide the error analysis and establish the equivalence with a family of mimetic finite difference methods.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
247
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 255 publications
(248 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
247
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The local estimates in Section 2 (and their three-dimensional analogs) are relevant for general second elliptic boundary value problems [8] and nonconforming virtual elements [3]. We also expect that the new techniques can be extended to virtual element methods for higher order problems [15,16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The local estimates in Section 2 (and their three-dimensional analogs) are relevant for general second elliptic boundary value problems [8] and nonconforming virtual elements [3]. We also expect that the new techniques can be extended to virtual element methods for higher order problems [15,16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3.18)- (3.20) in Ref. [4], respectively). They also play a role in determining the high-order part of some post-processings of the potential used in the context of Hybridizable Discontinuous Galerkin methods; cf., e.g., the variation proposed in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The choice l " k´1 allows one to establish a link (up to equivalent stabilizations) with the high-order MFD method of [6,43] (in the case k " 0, l "´1, one can recover the classical Crouzeix-Raviart element on simplices), while the choice l " k`1 is related to a variant of the HDG method introduced in [42].…”
Section: Remark 31 (Variant On Cell-based Unknowns)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with potential reconstruction operator p k`1 T defined by (6) and stabilization bilinear form j T defined by (10). Introduce now the following global bilinear form obtained by a standard element-by-element assembly procedure:…”
Section: Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation