2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.07.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new droplet digital PCR assay: improving detection of paucibacillary smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More smear-positive samples are needed to fully evaluate the kit’s performance in identifying the MDR. On the other hand, a modified method such as droplet digital PCR and multiplex allele-specific PCR could also improve the sensibility of mutation gene detection ( 38 40 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More smear-positive samples are needed to fully evaluate the kit’s performance in identifying the MDR. On the other hand, a modified method such as droplet digital PCR and multiplex allele-specific PCR could also improve the sensibility of mutation gene detection ( 38 40 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ddPCR, which is a method that quantifies the absolute copy number of a target DNA, is more sensitive and repeatable than real-time PCR ( 18 , 19 ) for the detection of the pathogen K. pneumoniae in fecal samples; ddPCR may provide a more simple and sensitive technique. ddPCR has been widely applied to the quantification of various pathogens, such as Mycobacterium turberculosis ( 20 , 21 ), Ureaplasma spp. ( 22 ), Verticillium dahliae , Verticillium longisporum ( 23 ), hepatitis B virus ( 24 ), and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) ( 25 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some suspected tuberculosis diagnoses still lacked etiological evidence. ddPCR is an excellent nucleic acid quantification technique with high sensitivity (Zhao et al, 2022). However, directly evaluating the diagnostic performance of ddPCR with mNGS and Xpert in pulmonary MTB infection is still rare so far.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%