1997
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-6055.1997.tb01431.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Design and some Preliminary Results for a Flight Intercept Trap to Sample Forest Canopy Arthropods

Abstract: With increasing interest in describing the arthropod fauna of rainforest canopies, there is also a need for different trapping techniques which, in combination, will allow a greater proportion of the fauna to be sampled. We describe the design of a flight intercept trap which can be suspended in the rainforest canopy for long periods of time. The flying invertebrate fauna was sampled over 5 months at differing heights in rainforest of northern Queensland using this trap. Invertebrate abundance and higher taxon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…interception surface) to at least twice the size of previous models (Hill and Cermak 1997, Bouget et al 2008). We believe this may have made it even more effective at intercepting the flight path of Coleopterans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…interception surface) to at least twice the size of previous models (Hill and Cermak 1997, Bouget et al 2008). We believe this may have made it even more effective at intercepting the flight path of Coleopterans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…A large number of windowpane trap types have been developed based on this model (Springate and Basset 1996, Hill and Cermak 1997, Carrel 2002, Fielding 2003, Fayt et al 2006, Bouget et al 2008, Missa et al 2009, Grimbacher and Stork 2009), but to date no standardized method has been widely accepted.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, our results did not support this, perhaps because our shrub-layer traps were located above the ground vegetation and we did not sample the fauna associated with the lower herbaceous layer. If we had sampled closer to the ground, understorey beetle diversity would have been higher (Hill and Cermak 1997), a finding reported by Ulyshen and Hanula (2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 65%
“…This gave a trapping effort of approximately 240 trap‐days for each bait type. Additionally, two flight intercept traps (FITs), an effective method of capturing actively foraging dung beetles (Hill & Cermak, 1997), were set up locally and run for approximately 2 weeks, to collect diet specialists (e.g. feeding on decaying fungi and fruit, or small‐sized dung pellets).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%