2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02509.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local and regional ecological morphology of dung beetle assemblages across four biogeographic regions

Abstract: Aim Niche partitioning within species assemblages is thought to influence species packing and/or total niche space occupied. The evolution of dung beetles (Scarabaeinae) is likely to have been strongly influenced by inter-specific competition, leading to niche partitioning. We consider whether local-scale processes leave a signature in regional patterns of functional diversity in dung beetle assemblages, and investigate the correlation between total exploited ecomorphological space and density of species packi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
49
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Striking morphospace divergence between some sister lineages with divergent feeding habits reveals that at least in the past (at the origin of these lineages) strong directed selection on morphospace was also likely to be linked with resource partitioning although being catalyzed by other factors such as feeding related locomotion behavior. But the same is true for scarabaeine dung beetles [17]. However, poor autecological knowledge of most pleurostict species and lacking community studies on assemblage level (competition acts only on individuals of all developmental stages in local assemblages) make it hard to investigate the linkage between divergence and competition in more detail.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Striking morphospace divergence between some sister lineages with divergent feeding habits reveals that at least in the past (at the origin of these lineages) strong directed selection on morphospace was also likely to be linked with resource partitioning although being catalyzed by other factors such as feeding related locomotion behavior. But the same is true for scarabaeine dung beetles [17]. However, poor autecological knowledge of most pleurostict species and lacking community studies on assemblage level (competition acts only on individuals of all developmental stages in local assemblages) make it hard to investigate the linkage between divergence and competition in more detail.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) using a Leica M250 microscope and Life Measurement software (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany); with digital calipers (0.01-mm resolution) we measured pronotum height; and dry biomass was determined using a Shimadzu AY220 balance (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) with precision to 0.0001g. Because these morphological traits may not fully capture all functionally relevant behavioral information (Inward et al 2011), we also included three categorical traits: nesting strategy (roller, tunneller, or dweller; for description see Hanski and Cambefort 1991), activity period (nocturnal, diurnal, crepuscular, or generalist), and diet (coprophagous or generalist). Front tibia and femur area were summed to provide a total front leg area, and pronotum height and area were multiplied to estimate pronotum volume.…”
Section: Beetle Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 within a taxon fills a morphospace) (McClain et al 2004), responses of assemblage structure to habitat complexity (Willis et al 2005, Montaña andWinemiller, 2010), and convergent or divergent patterns of morphology among continents (Ricklefs and Travis 1980, Winemiller 1991, Inward et al 2011, Ricklefs 2012, Montaña et al 2014. Morphological data also have been used to test the relative importance of environmental filtering and limiting similarity in structuring species assemblages (e.g., Cadotte et al 2013Cadotte et al , 2015.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%