2017
DOI: 10.1080/15481603.2017.1338390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new descriptor for improving geometric-based matching of linear objects on multi-scale datasets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Object matching refers to the identification of the objects with an equivalent entity in several datasets [58][59][60][61]. The main aim of object matching was to identify the corresponding objects across historical versions in the OSM history file.…”
Section: Object Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Object matching refers to the identification of the objects with an equivalent entity in several datasets [58][59][60][61]. The main aim of object matching was to identify the corresponding objects across historical versions in the OSM history file.…”
Section: Object Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic framework for the assessment of OSM geometric quality is based on the comparison of OSM geometric data with authoritative geospatial data sources. Different approaches have been proposed to investigate the completeness and positional accuracy of road networks and buildings in OSM (Brovelli & Zamboni, 2018; Chehreghan & Abbaspour, 2017; Fairbairn & Al‐Bakri, 2013; Fan et al, 2014; Koukoletsos et al, 2012). Geoscientists have studied the OSM data in different countries such as Germany (Brückner et al, 2021; Hecht et al, 2013; Neis et al, 2012), France (Girres & Touya, 2010), UK (Haklay, 2010), Sweden (Abdolmajidi et al, 2015), Canada (Zhang, 2017), Iran (Forghani & Delavar, 2014; Minaei, 2020), and Turkey (Zia et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic framework for the assessment of OSM geometric quality is based on the comparison of OSM geometric data with authoritative geospatial data sources. Different approaches have been proposed to investigate the completeness and positional accuracy of road networks and buildings in OSM (Brovelli & Zamboni, 2018;Chehreghan & Abbaspour, 2017;Fairbairn & Al-Bakri, 2013;Fan et al, 2014;Koukoletsos et al, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li, Li, and Xie (2017) used the TF distance to evaluate the difference between different generalizations of a building's footprint that they produced using a “morphing” algorithm. The possibility of using the TF distance to measure polyline similarity was also discussed by Zhang (2009) and Chehreghan and Abbaspour (2017a), but no experimental results are reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The area is computed as the accumulated Lp distance of the TF over the unit length, with L2 distance being used originally (Arkin et al., 1991). Zhang (2009) and Chehreghan and Abbaspour (2017a) described the formula of the shape dissimilarity measure between polylines A and B (using L1 distance) as shown in Equation (1):TFA,B=false∫01fθAt,θBtdtfθA,θB=θAθB,ifθAθBπ2π||θAθB,otherwise…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%