2016
DOI: 10.1140/epjb/e2016-70140-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new criterion for melting of nanostructures of arbitrary shapes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We associate the current value at which the microheater fails to the melting temperature of platinum (1768 °C). The melting point of thin films for a thickness >50 nm is equivalent to the bulk values [47,48]. We took the melting temperature and the corresponding power that led to failure of the heater as one calibration point (burn-through), and room temperature as second calibration point.…”
Section: Microheatermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We associate the current value at which the microheater fails to the melting temperature of platinum (1768 °C). The melting point of thin films for a thickness >50 nm is equivalent to the bulk values [47,48]. We took the melting temperature and the corresponding power that led to failure of the heater as one calibration point (burn-through), and room temperature as second calibration point.…”
Section: Microheatermentioning
confidence: 99%