2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-20675-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Cold War?

Abstract: This book offers a timely assessment of the current US-Russian relations by addressing the most pressing question confronting international relations scholars: What is the prospect of renewed great power competition and rivalry? Utilizing the richness of neoclassical realism (Type III), Smith skillfully identifies four key dimensions to compare the Cold War and the current state of US-Russian relations, giving us a much better picture of the potential for a new cold war, and making it essential reading.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For some of the CEE countries, such shift was associated with taking sides in the escalating conflict between the United States and China. Much of this has revolved around the ‘technological Cold War’ between Washington and Beijing (Smith, 2020). In particular, the United States has used the Three Seas Initiative – framing the region between the Adriatic, the Black and the Baltic Seas, comprising 12 EU states, chiefly from the CEE region and also members of China’s ‘17+1’ grouping – to garner support for the so-called ‘Clean Network’ initiative (Whyte, 2020), which Chinese diplomats have panned as discriminatory and in fact a ‘dirty network’ (Foreign Ministry Regular Press Conference, 2020).…”
Section: Localizing Chinamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For some of the CEE countries, such shift was associated with taking sides in the escalating conflict between the United States and China. Much of this has revolved around the ‘technological Cold War’ between Washington and Beijing (Smith, 2020). In particular, the United States has used the Three Seas Initiative – framing the region between the Adriatic, the Black and the Baltic Seas, comprising 12 EU states, chiefly from the CEE region and also members of China’s ‘17+1’ grouping – to garner support for the so-called ‘Clean Network’ initiative (Whyte, 2020), which Chinese diplomats have panned as discriminatory and in fact a ‘dirty network’ (Foreign Ministry Regular Press Conference, 2020).…”
Section: Localizing Chinamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, separate Chinese, EUROfusion (ITER), U.K., and U.S. public sector DEMO-class machines are being or are due to be developed (Department of Energy, 2020; EUROfusion, 2020; National Academies, 2021), together with mainly Western private-sector machines, risking factionalism in the global fusion community. This is especially true of leading ITER community members, notably China, Russia, and the U.S., who are already engaged in a New Cold War (e.g., Woodward, 2017; Smith, 2020). In part, perhaps this explains why neither Putin nor Brouillette mentioned peace.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%