A new classification scheme for periodontal and peri‐implant diseases and conditions – Introduction and key changes from the 1999 classification

Abstract

A classification scheme for periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions is necessary for clinicians to properly diagnose and treat patients as well as for scientists to investigate etiology, pathogenesis, natural history, and treatment of the diseases and conditions. This paper summarizes the proceedings of the World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-implant Diseases and Conditions. The workshop was co-sponsored by the American Academy of Periodontology (AAP) and the European Federation of Periodontology (EFP) and included expert participants from all over the world. Planning for the conference, which was held in Chicago on November 9 to 11, 2017, began in early 2015. An organizing committee from the AAP and EFP commissioned 19 review papers and four consensus reports covering relevant areas in periodontology and implant dentistry. The authors were charged with updating the 1999 classification of periodontal diseases and conditions and developing a similar scheme for peri-implant diseases and conditions. Reviewers and workgroups were also asked to establish pertinent case definitions and to provide diagnostic criteria to aid clinicians in the use of the new classification. All findings and recommendations of the workshop were agreed to by consensus. This introductory paper presents an overview for the new classification of periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions, along with a condensed scheme for each of four workgroup sections, but readers are directed to the pertinent consensus reports and review papers for a thorough discussion of the rationale, criteria, and interpretation of the proposed classification. Changes to the 1999 classification are highlighted and discussed. Although the intent of the workshop was to base classification on the strongest available scientific evidence, lower level evidence and expert opinion were inevitably used whenever sufficient research data were unavailable. The scope of this workshop was to align and update the classification scheme to the current understanding of periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions. This introductory overview presents the schematic tables for the new classification of periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions and briefly highlights changes made to the 1999 classification. It cannot present the wealth of information included in the reviews, case definition papers, and consensus reports that has guided the development of the new classification, and reference to the consensus and case definition papers is necessary to provide a thorough understanding of its use for either case management or scientific investigation. Therefore, it is strongly recommended that the reader use this overview as an introduction to these subjects. Accessing this publication online will allow the reader to use the links in this overview and the tables to view the source papers (Table ).

Characterization of macrophages infiltrating peri‐implantitis lesions

“…showing signs of loss of clinical attachment level (CAL) ≥5mm, probing depths (PD) ≥4mm, bleeding on probing (BOP), and radiographic marginal bone loss of ≥ 33% (Caton et al, 2018;Papapanou et al, 2018).…”

Could drug burden be associated with severe periodontitis in patients receiving haemodialysis?

“…According to the World Workshop (2017) Classification of Periodontal and Peri-implant Diseases and Conditions (Caton et al 2018), the patients diagnosed with periodontitis were divided into subgroups based on the severity and complexity of management:…”

Preliminary investigation on the molecular mechanisms underlying the correlation between VDR‐FokI genotype and periodontitis

“…18 It was also revealed by a meta-analysis that the allele F might be an indicator for higher susceptibility of AgP in Asians. 5 According to the new classification of periodontal diseases, [19][20][21][22] there is no evidence that AgP and CP are two different diseases. Thus, it could be concluded that people with the shorter VDR were more likely to develop periodontitis; however, the mechanism is unknown and has never been reported.…”