2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11427-012-4337-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new approach to the diagnosis of deficits in processing faces: Potential application in autism research

Abstract: Deficits in social communication are one of the behavioral signatures of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Because faces are arguably the most important social stimuli that we encounter in everyday life, investigating the ability of individuals with ASD to process faces is thought to be important for understanding the nature of ASD. However, although a considerable body of evidence suggests that ASD individuals show specific impairments in face processing, a significant number of studies argue otherwise. Through… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This interview process resulted in 180 DP candidates (diagnosis rate: ∼73%). In stage 3: diagnostic behavioral test, an objective testold/new face memory test (Duchaine and Nakayama, 2004;Wang et al, 2012Wang et al, , 2015 -was conducted to 105 of the 180 potential DPs willing to participate in behavioral tests and resulted in 64 DP participants whose performance was 1 SD below an independent norm of 182 unscreened college students (diagnosis rate: ∼61%). Finally, in stage 4: validation, a paper-based famous-face test was used to confirm whether the 64 DP participants had impairment in face recognition in daily life.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This interview process resulted in 180 DP candidates (diagnosis rate: ∼73%). In stage 3: diagnostic behavioral test, an objective testold/new face memory test (Duchaine and Nakayama, 2004;Wang et al, 2012Wang et al, , 2015 -was conducted to 105 of the 180 potential DPs willing to participate in behavioral tests and resulted in 64 DP participants whose performance was 1 SD below an independent norm of 182 unscreened college students (diagnosis rate: ∼61%). Finally, in stage 4: validation, a paper-based famous-face test was used to confirm whether the 64 DP participants had impairment in face recognition in daily life.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, mental representations of familiar faces are comprehensive, drawing from a variety of experiences to form a stable impression of a particular individual (as in the case of famous faces), which differs from unfamiliar ones, as mentioned above 11,26 . Despite this, contrary to face memory, famous face recognition in ASDs has not been thoroughly investigated 27 . Some theories suggest that also metacognitive abilities can affect cognitive performance 28 ; that is, if people believe to have poor memory skills, they tend to poorly perform on actual memory tasks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observers are then instructed to indicate whether the face stimulus is novel or not. This task has been shown to be very reliable and sensitive in identifying individuals with selective impairments in face processing and thus might be a promising test in ASD diagnosis [10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%