2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new approach to nationwide sanitation planning for developing countries: Case study of Indonesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, they have no collaborative role with the local land use planners, who are charge of translating the health principles into practice. Kerstens et al (2016) points the barriers in the planning to achieve sanitation, including inadequate investments, low community awareness, limited crosssector policy coordination, and absence of regulatory frameworks.…”
Section: Incorporating Health Promotion Into Land Use Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they have no collaborative role with the local land use planners, who are charge of translating the health principles into practice. Kerstens et al (2016) points the barriers in the planning to achieve sanitation, including inadequate investments, low community awareness, limited crosssector policy coordination, and absence of regulatory frameworks.…”
Section: Incorporating Health Promotion Into Land Use Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a. Current users in urban areas with a residential density between 25 -100 pp/ha apply on-site systems, whereas all new development will be served by medium centralized system [50]; b. Selection criteria are formulated based on the expected population status in 2020 (mid-term).…”
Section: Step 3: Formulation Of Interventions and Their Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… The BCR considers the overall societal perspective, whereas different costs and benefits are incurred and enjoyed by different stakeholders. Thus, the costs of domestic interventions are to a large extent paid for by the national and local governments (in Indonesia ~ 70%) and to lesser extent by individual households [50], whereas industries typically pay the costs of the interventions themselves [37]. Benefits of improved water quality as a result of interventions can be either increased revenues (e.g.…”
Section: Options For Extending the Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only 1% of all wastewater in Indonesia is treated [8]. Despite attempts to manage waste effectively, central domestic waste water treatment and sewer systems are still lacking and should be improved [9]. Industrial waste water treatment is governed through the PROPER mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%