Africon 2009 2009
DOI: 10.1109/afrcon.2009.5308552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A neural fuzzy based maximum power point tracker for a photovoltaic system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Taiwan's subtropical outdoor environment, the average solar radiation and temperature are approximately 0.20 -0.80 kW/m 2 and 30 -40°C, respectively, during the summer season. For various radiation and temperature values, the MPPT algorithm [1][2][3][18][19] can be employed to control the DC-DC boost converter until the desired MOP and output voltage is reached. In this study, an ICM based method [1,3] is used to estimate the desired output and adjust the boost converter's duty ratio to match the maximum point.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Taiwan's subtropical outdoor environment, the average solar radiation and temperature are approximately 0.20 -0.80 kW/m 2 and 30 -40°C, respectively, during the summer season. For various radiation and temperature values, the MPPT algorithm [1][2][3][18][19] can be employed to control the DC-DC boost converter until the desired MOP and output voltage is reached. In this study, an ICM based method [1,3] is used to estimate the desired output and adjust the boost converter's duty ratio to match the maximum point.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These factors directly relate to the duty ratio adjustment of the dc/dc converter. Since conventional MPPT algorithms are unable to meet those requirements (Otieno et al, 2009;Yu, 2007), adaptive MPPT approaches have been proposed recently, including fuzzy logic based MPPT (Veerachary et al, 2003;Khaehintung et al, 2004), neural networks MPPT (Hussein et al, 2002;Sun et al, 2002) and ripple correlation control MPPT (Midya et al, 1996), etc. All of them basically belong to a "discrete" adaptive MPPT technique.…”
Section: Fast and Reliable Adaptive Mppt Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, ANFIS can generate the fuzzy rules automatically. Various ANFIS-based MPPT methods have been proposed to achieve MPPT [20][21][22][23][24]. The input variables and the output variables are different from one configuration to another.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disadvantage of this method is that the need for interrupting the PV system to measure the open circuit voltage and need to short circuit the PV module terminals to measure the short circuit current, which finally increases the system losses. Some other papers use the solar radiation and temperature as input variables, and the output variable is the voltage at maximum power (V MPP ) or the maximum power itself (P MPP ) [21,23,24]. However, measuring irradiance level by solar radiation sensor is not the exact solar radiation incident on the PV module since the aging of the PV modules as well as the partial shading is not taken into considerations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%