A network modeling approach to policy implementation in natural resource management agencies

Abstract

Natural resource agencies are responsible for managing specific aspects of the environment through the development and implementation of policies. Computational advances have emerged in recent years that provide opportunities for simulating the influence that agency structure has on policy outcomes, particularly those stemming from the area of network theory and analysis. However, there remains a need for methods that can measure and visualize the confounding effects that multiple agency characteristics may impose on policy implementation. The complex interactions amongst these factors require an approach that can evaluate these factors in relation to one another and provide a way to abstract meaningful findings that can be useful for both scientists and agencies to consider for future policy development. In this study, we present a network simulation modeling approach that (1) builds upon existing conceptualizations of bureaucrat decision-making within agency networks, (2) uses network theory to construct idealized natural resource agency networks that can be used to evaluate how agency structure influences policy implementation, and (3) visualizes simulation results to better understand how bureaucrat behaviors and relationships in concert with agency structure influence policy outcomes. Using this approach, we demonstrate how different aspects of decision-making by bureaucrats interact with the spatial constraints of institutional networks to influence policy outcomes. The network modeling and visualization methods presented here offer an alternative approach in the policy science toolbox that can help

Bureaucratic inertia in dealing with annual forest fires in Indonesia

“…It has also been recognised in the latest structural literature that the expense of enforcing policies is a major cause of structural resistance. Institutional resistance applies to the 'stickiness' (Hur et al 2019) of structures or how they avoid reform (Pierson 2004;Kenbeek et al 2016;Smith 2016). Campeau (2019) and Williams (2020) defined the following three major structural inertia factors in the latest operational literature: (1) expense, which refers to rules and laws that direct the collaboration of actors; (2) complexity, which refers to how each agent determines his or her task; (3) path dependence, which refers to the hierarchical framework and the rules and procedures that direct the collaboration of actors.…”

Identifying Clusters of Complex Urban–Rural Issues as Part of Policy Making Process Using a Network Analysis Approach: A Case Study in Bahía de Los Ángeles, Mexico

“…Because complex systems are networks made of nodes that interact with each other [8] and urban systems can be conceived as made of components with relations and interactions, a common way to study them has usually involved network theory [6]. Natural resource management [9], detection of socio-economic urban patterns [2], urban landscapes [10], traffic and transport [11,12], connectivity [13], markets, population [14], epidemics [15], land use change [16] and social networks [17] are some of the urban issues studied with this approach, becoming crucial to the understanding of features and dynamics of urban systems.…”