2001
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2001.tb02369.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Nested Rediscretization Method to Improve Pathline Resolution by Eliminating Weak Sinks Representing Wells

Abstract: This paper discusses a method for overcoming the problem of weak sinks representing wells that result from spatial discretization effects when using MODPATH, the particle-tracking postprocessor for the ground water flow model MODFLOW. Weak sink cells are model cells that represent a well that does not discharge at a sufficiently large rate to capture all of the flow entering the cell; therefore, flowpaths within these cells cannot be uniquely defined because it is impossible to know whether a given water parti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Either a strong sink cell or a weak sink cell may represent an actual physical strong sink. An example of the latter is a strong sink well whose capture zone does not fully cover the well cell (Spitz et al 2001). Likewise, either type of sink cell may also represent a physical weak sink.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Either a strong sink cell or a weak sink cell may represent an actual physical strong sink. An example of the latter is a strong sink well whose capture zone does not fully cover the well cell (Spitz et al 2001). Likewise, either type of sink cell may also represent a physical weak sink.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…discontinuities, or very thin units) requires relatively small grid spacing. Many authors choose to reduce or eliminate the FD limitations by using techniques of mesh refinement [33,39,45]. However, fine grids can result in long execution times that prohibit the many model runs often needed to understand the system dynamics and calibrate the model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, FDM is not flexible to arbitrary boundary geometries and may lose accuracy when predicting hydraulic heads in the vicinity of irregular boundaries. The only way to fit MODFLOW with arbitrary boundary geometries is by using the mesh refinement, but could greatly increase the computational cost (Spitz et al, 2001;Mehl and Hill, 2004). Moreover, FEM is notorious for its mass imbalance at the local level (Di Giammarco et al, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%