2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2015.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A need for balanced approach to neighborhood sustainability assessments: A critical review and analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
116
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
116
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A detailed review of sustainability rating tools for buildings can be found in Nguyen and Atlan [40] who reviewed and compared five prominent rating tools, namely Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Methodology (BREEAM), Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), Comprehensive Assessment System for Building Environmental Efficiency (CASBEE), GREEN STAR (a sustainability rating system for buildings in Australia) and the Hong Kong Building Environmental Assessment Method (HK-BEAM). Furthermore, Sharifi and Murayama [24] and Komeily and Srinivasan [25] conducted critical and extensive reviews comparing different neighborhood sustainability assessment (NSA) tools. They concluded that NSA methodologies should be improved and enhanced with regard to: (a) a more balanced approach towards inclusion of a wider array of stakeholders, particularly citizens' participation; (b) balanced consideration towards all four aspects of sustainability, including institutional aspects; (c) adaptability to the local context and characteristics of the project; (d) a focus on cross-and multi sectoral aspects; and (e) a project's life time considerations.…”
Section: Rating Sustainability Benefit Assessment Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A detailed review of sustainability rating tools for buildings can be found in Nguyen and Atlan [40] who reviewed and compared five prominent rating tools, namely Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Methodology (BREEAM), Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), Comprehensive Assessment System for Building Environmental Efficiency (CASBEE), GREEN STAR (a sustainability rating system for buildings in Australia) and the Hong Kong Building Environmental Assessment Method (HK-BEAM). Furthermore, Sharifi and Murayama [24] and Komeily and Srinivasan [25] conducted critical and extensive reviews comparing different neighborhood sustainability assessment (NSA) tools. They concluded that NSA methodologies should be improved and enhanced with regard to: (a) a more balanced approach towards inclusion of a wider array of stakeholders, particularly citizens' participation; (b) balanced consideration towards all four aspects of sustainability, including institutional aspects; (c) adaptability to the local context and characteristics of the project; (d) a focus on cross-and multi sectoral aspects; and (e) a project's life time considerations.…”
Section: Rating Sustainability Benefit Assessment Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, Section 6 presents the step by step development of the SRBA methodology. Section 7 demonstrates an illustrative example of the application of SRBA in Colombia, including GIS maps There is a large diversity of sustainability assessment methods at different levels, such as city (e.g., the Green City Index developed by Siemens and the Urban Sustainability Index developed by Columbia University, Tsinghua University and McKinsey), neighborhood [24,25] and building [26], and in relation to different sectors, such as energy [27], transport [28], waste management [29] and water [30]. However, there is a lack of a project-based sustainability benefits assessment methodology that could integrate different urban agendas, be relevant to multiple sectors and provide the flexibility of modification and application to different local contexts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para o alcance do objetivo desta pesquisa, operacionalizaram-se as duas primeiras etapas do ProKnow-C, ou seja, (i) a formação de um portfólio de artigos relevantes e alinhados ao tema, e (ii) a análise bibliométrica das variáveis básicas (artigos, periódicos, autores e ferramentas de AD) e variáveis avançadas (nível do sistema/ferramenta de avaliação e ciclo de vida do sistema/ferramenta), que respondem pelo mapeamento da literatura e possibilitam a geração de conhecimento sobre o tema. (BERARDI, 2013;TURCU, 2013;KOMEILY;SRINIVASAN, 2015;AHVENNIEMI et al, 2016), qualidade de vida (ALQAHTANYA et al, 2012) e cultura (AMEEN et al, 2015).…”
Section: Referencial Teórico: Avaliação De Desempenho No Desenvolvimeunclassified
“…For example, in Europe more than 2/3 of the population lives in cities (Salvia et al, 2015). The development of environmental visions and strategies are important steps in achieving these shifts as a means of setting out guiding principles and processes (Komeily and Srinivasan, 2015;Wangel et al, 2013).…”
Section: Future Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%