2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00419-013-0736-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A necessary modification for the finite element analysis of cracked members detection, construction, and justification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The equivalent mass method was only applicable to free vibration analysis. The investigation on the analysis of cracked problems was continued and led to the derivation of the innovative weak form equations for the finite element analysis of cracked beams in Ranjbaran and Rousta [20], a necessary modification for the finite element analysis of cracked members in Ranjbaran et al [21], the square of the Dirac's delta for use in structural mechanics by Ranjbaran [22], new finite element formulation for buckling analysis of cracked structures in Ranjbaran and Ranjbaran [23], and free vibration analysis of stiffened frames in Ranjbaran [24].…”
Section: List Of Symbolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equivalent mass method was only applicable to free vibration analysis. The investigation on the analysis of cracked problems was continued and led to the derivation of the innovative weak form equations for the finite element analysis of cracked beams in Ranjbaran and Rousta [20], a necessary modification for the finite element analysis of cracked members in Ranjbaran et al [21], the square of the Dirac's delta for use in structural mechanics by Ranjbaran [22], new finite element formulation for buckling analysis of cracked structures in Ranjbaran and Ranjbaran [23], and free vibration analysis of stiffened frames in Ranjbaran [24].…”
Section: List Of Symbolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is found that the initial crack-stiffness matrix as defined in Eq. (27) is not correct and should be modified [44][45][46]! For several bar members and several beam members, via hundreds of trial free vibration analyses, the numerical values for the survive function ( R S ) (A coefficient to be multiplied by the initial crack integral to obtain the correct result) are defined as in Table 2.…”
Section:  (25)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The state of the art of the (FAD) contains epistemic uncertainty, that should be modified. The current authors research team detected the need for remedy and after extensive research (Ranjbaran, 2010;Ranjbaran et al, 2013;Ranjbaran and Ranjbaran, 2014;Ranjbaran et al, 2020a;2020b;2020c;2020d;2021;Amirian and Ranjbaran, 2019;Baharvand and Ranjbaran, 2020), in the last two decades, proposed the Change of State Philosophy (CSP) which digested in the Persian Curves (PC) (Ranjbaran et al, 2020a), that is used for the development of a reliable (FAD). The validity of the work is verified via concise mathematical logics and comparison of the results with those of the others as follows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%