2018
DOI: 10.1039/c8tb02083c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A near-infrared emission fluorescent probe with multi-rotatable moieties for highly sensitive detection of mitochondrial viscosity in an inflammatory cell model

Abstract: We have designed a new near-infrared emission fluorescent probe with multi-rotatable moieties for the imaging of mitochondrial viscosity in an inflammatory cell model.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the excellent imaging properties and photostability of DSL1 (Supporting Information Figure S12), we chose DSL1 as a representative luminophore to further clarify the advantages of DSLs in bioimaging, by comparing with classic monomer-dependent emission luminophores (Rh 6G) and aggregate-dependent emission luminophores (TPE1 and TPE2). [25][26][27][28] As shown in Supporting Information Figure S13, DSL1-loaded cells showed stronger fluorescence than TPE1 and TPE2-loaded cells under the same concentrations, suggesting its better imaging effects. In addition, with the increased incubation concentrations of these luminophores, the fluorescence in Rh 6G-incubated cells (or tissues) showed a tendency of first increasing and subsequently decreasing, and sharply increase only in high concentration of TPE1-incubated cells or tissues (Supporting Information Figure S14).…”
Section: Page 9 Of 26mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Based on the excellent imaging properties and photostability of DSL1 (Supporting Information Figure S12), we chose DSL1 as a representative luminophore to further clarify the advantages of DSLs in bioimaging, by comparing with classic monomer-dependent emission luminophores (Rh 6G) and aggregate-dependent emission luminophores (TPE1 and TPE2). [25][26][27][28] As shown in Supporting Information Figure S13, DSL1-loaded cells showed stronger fluorescence than TPE1 and TPE2-loaded cells under the same concentrations, suggesting its better imaging effects. In addition, with the increased incubation concentrations of these luminophores, the fluorescence in Rh 6G-incubated cells (or tissues) showed a tendency of first increasing and subsequently decreasing, and sharply increase only in high concentration of TPE1-incubated cells or tissues (Supporting Information Figure S14).…”
Section: Page 9 Of 26mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Probe 2 with a large Stokes shift and viscosity sensitivity was used to detect mitochondrial viscosity in living cells, zebra fish, and living mice. By assembly of tetraphenylethylene (TPE) and an indole salt moiety, a near‐infrared emission fluorescent probe 3 for viscosity detection in mitochondria of inflammatory cell was developed [30] . Probe 3 showed a large Stokes shift (190 nm) and excellent sensitivity and selectivity to viscosity in near‐infrared emission (650 nm).…”
Section: Small Molecular Fluorescent Probes For Viscositymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the existing models for mitochondrial viscosity studies could be classified into two categories. The first kind is the ionophores (monensin or nystatin), which could induce mitochondrial dysfunction by destroying the structure of mitochondria, leading to the viscosity variation. , The other kind is the lipopolysaccharide (LPS), which has been confirmed to increase the viscosity by producing inflammation. , Limited disease models prevent us from delving into the relationship between disease and viscosity. To address this issue, more disease models have been urgently developed for studies aimed at investigating biological processes and promoting fundamental research in mitochondrial viscosity associated diseases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%