2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2013.05.074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A NBD-based selective colorimetric and fluorescent chemosensor for Hg2+

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The detection limit of receptor R 1 with Pb 2+ is 0.26 × 10 ‐6 mol l −1 , R 1 with Hg 2+ is 0.28 × 10 −6 mol l −1 , R 2 with Hg 2+ is 0.18 × 10 −6 mol L −1 , and R 2 with Cu 2+ is 0.29 × 10 −6 mol L −1 . Detection limit of R 1 and R 2 was compared with some reported chemosensors for Cu 2+ , Hg 2+ , and Pb 2+ (Table ) (Ranyuk et al ., ; Jiang et al ., ; Huo et al ., ; Kim et al ., ; Leea et al ., ; Lin et al ., ; Tang et al ., ; Wang et al ., ). While each chemosensor showed some advantages such as easy synthesis, high sensitivity, no interference (Ranyuk et al ., ; Kim et al ., ; Lin et al ., ) naked eye detection and application in living cell imaging.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The detection limit of receptor R 1 with Pb 2+ is 0.26 × 10 ‐6 mol l −1 , R 1 with Hg 2+ is 0.28 × 10 −6 mol l −1 , R 2 with Hg 2+ is 0.18 × 10 −6 mol L −1 , and R 2 with Cu 2+ is 0.29 × 10 −6 mol L −1 . Detection limit of R 1 and R 2 was compared with some reported chemosensors for Cu 2+ , Hg 2+ , and Pb 2+ (Table ) (Ranyuk et al ., ; Jiang et al ., ; Huo et al ., ; Kim et al ., ; Leea et al ., ; Lin et al ., ; Tang et al ., ; Wang et al ., ). While each chemosensor showed some advantages such as easy synthesis, high sensitivity, no interference (Ranyuk et al ., ; Kim et al ., ; Lin et al ., ) naked eye detection and application in living cell imaging.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detection limit of R1 and R2 was compared with some reported chemosensors for Cu 2+ , Hg 2+ , and Pb 2+ (Table 3) (Ranyuk et al, 2009;Jiang et al, 2011;Huo et al, 2013;Kim et al, 2013;Leea et al, 2013;Lin et al, 2013;Tang et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2013). While each chemosensor showed some advantages such as easy synthesis, high sensitivity, no interference (Ranyuk et al, 2009;Kim et al, 2013;Lin et al, 2013) naked eye detection and application in living cell imaging. Our receptor R1 and R2 exhibited quite appealing analytical features such as easy synthesis, dual sensing methods (naked eye and fluorescence detection), and simultaneous multiple cation sensing (R1 = Cu 2+ , Hg 2+ , R2 = Hg 2+ , Pb 2+ , and Sn 2+ ).…”
Section: Fluorescence Spectroscopic Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proposed sensing mechanism of 94 and 95 towards Hg 2+ 111,112. Proposed sensing mechanism of 94 and 95 towards Hg 2+ 111,112.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, several molecular probe-based sensors using organic chromophores, quantum dots (QDs), small fluorescent organic molecules, proteins, antibodies and conjugated polymers coupled with several spectrometric and electrochemical techniques are reported for mercury(II) determination [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53]. Some of these methods suffere from solubility issues, low stability, lower sensitivity and selectivity, complicated synthesis procedures and environmentally unfriendliness to monitor mercury(II) in biological and environmental samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%