2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2012.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A national perspective on the role of Marine Protected Areas in sustaining fisheries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The benefit of spillover from a source population is less apparent for well-managed fisheries than for heavily exploited stocks that lack management controls outside refuges, although the loss of yield in well-managed fisheries that exploit slow-growing, highly-mobile species (e.g., Lake Trout) is lower near no-take refuges (Buxton et al 2014). Therefore, effective management that enforces regulations and human use in and around a refuge is essential (Wenzel et al 2013). Lastly, APA design is important-not only to ensure inclusion of suitable habitat for target species but also to reduce the costs of regulation enforcement; the most costeffective APA design is a single, large, no-take refuge like the Gull Island Shoal Refuge (Ban et al 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefit of spillover from a source population is less apparent for well-managed fisheries than for heavily exploited stocks that lack management controls outside refuges, although the loss of yield in well-managed fisheries that exploit slow-growing, highly-mobile species (e.g., Lake Trout) is lower near no-take refuges (Buxton et al 2014). Therefore, effective management that enforces regulations and human use in and around a refuge is essential (Wenzel et al 2013). Lastly, APA design is important-not only to ensure inclusion of suitable habitat for target species but also to reduce the costs of regulation enforcement; the most costeffective APA design is a single, large, no-take refuge like the Gull Island Shoal Refuge (Ban et al 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%