2002
DOI: 10.1080/07408170208928934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multivariate double EWMA process adjustment scheme for drifting processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further extensions have been made by Adivikolanu and Zafiriou (2000). Stability conditions for double-EWMA controllers were presented by Del Castillo and Rajagopal (2002). Adivikolanu and Zafiriou (1997) presented an EWMA controller in an IMC structure (as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Stability Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Further extensions have been made by Adivikolanu and Zafiriou (2000). Stability conditions for double-EWMA controllers were presented by Del Castillo and Rajagopal (2002). Adivikolanu and Zafiriou (1997) presented an EWMA controller in an IMC structure (as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Stability Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, the MIMO process cannot be controlled properly by EWMA if there is correlation between different outputs [19]. Tseng et al [18] proposed a multivariate EWMA controller (termed MEWMA) to tackle this problem.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While significant efforts have been devoted to the improvement of the stability and sensitivity in response to process noise of the EWMA scheme (e.g., Wang, 2010;Wang et al, 2010), this scheme becomes insufficient for processes subject to highly nonlinear batch-to-batch dynamics of the process drift. Motivated by this, several authors have proposed using a double exponentially weighted moving average (dEWMA) formula, which can capture the changes in the rate of the process drift, and thus, forecast the process drift in the next batch run (Bulter and Stefani, 1994;Simith et al, 1998;Castillo, 1999;Chen and Guo, 2001;Castillo and Rajagopal, 2002;Su and Hsu, 2004;Tseng and Hsu, 2005;Wu and Maa, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%