A multistage mixed methods study protocol to evaluate the implementation and impact of a reconfiguration of acute medicine in Ireland’s hospitals

Abstract

BackgroundTo address deficits in the delivery of acute services in Ireland, the National Acute Medicine Programme (NAMP) was established in 2010 to optimise the management of acutely ill medical patients in the hospital setting, and to ensure their supported discharge to primary and community-based care. NAMP aims to reduce inappropriate hospital admissions, reduce length of hospital stay and ensure patients receive timely treatment in the most appropriate setting. It does so primarily via the development of Acute Medical Assessment Units (AMAUs) for the rapid assessment and management of medical patients presenting to hospitals, as well as streamlining the care of those admitted for further care. This study will examine the impact of this programme on patient care and identify the factors influencing its implementation and operation.MethodsWe will use a multistage mixed methods evaluation with an explanatory sequential design. Firstly, we will develop a logic model to describe the programme’s outcomes, its components and the mechanisms of change by which it expects to achieve these outcomes. Then we will assess implementation by measuring utilisation of the Units and comparing the organisational functions implemented to that recommended by the NAMP model of care. Using comparative case study research, we will identify the factors which have influenced the programme’s implementation and its operation using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to guide data collection and analysis. This will be followed by an estimation of the impact of the programme on reducing overnight emergency admissions for potentially avoidable medical conditions, and reducing length of hospital stay of acute medical patients. Lastly, data from each stage will be integrated to examine how the programme’s outcomes can be explained by the level of implementation.DiscussionThis formative evaluation will enable us to examine whether the NAMP is improving patient care and importantly draw conclusions on how it is doing so. It will identify the factors that contribute to how well the programme is being implemented in the real-world. Lessons learnt will be instrumental in sustaining this programme as well as planning, implementing, and assessing other transformative programmes, especially in the acute care setting.

Patient perspectives on, and effects of, medication management in geriatric fallers (the EMMA study): protocol for a mixed-methods pre-post study

“…Acceptance rate of pharmaceutical interventions by physicians77 and transfer of the optimised medication plan by orthopaedists/traumatologists into the patients’ letters of hospital discharge according to CFIR and Proctor et al 44 45…”

“…44 The CFIR is combined with conceptual model of implementation research by Proctor et al to better represent outcomes (both implementation and programme outcomes). 45 Findings could help to plan and execute a larger study and to investigate the effectiveness of an optimised CMM process in geriatric fallers and contribute to the development of recommendations on fall prevention and drug therapy safety in a geriatric fracture practice setting.…”

“…Proctor et al present a model to distinguish implementation outcomes (eg, feasibility measures) and programme outcomes (eg, service-level outcomes and patient-level outcomes), emphasising that a programme is only effective when it is well implemented 44. The CFIR is combined with conceptual model of implementation research by Proctor et al to better represent outcomes (both implementation and programme outcomes) 45. Findings could help to plan and execute a larger study and to investigate the effectiveness of an optimised CMM process in geriatric fallers and contribute to the development of recommendations on fall prevention and drug therapy safety in a geriatric fracture practice setting.…”

Accessibility Experience Design (AxD): A Bi-directional Accessibility Perspective for e-Business Services

“…Due to the nature of the study as dictated by the stated aim, a mix of quantitative and qualitative data was needed. Additional research was carried out through Accessibility Experience Design (AxD): A Bi-directional Accessibility Perspective for e-Business… DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.97488 a pragmatic process, using a rather abductive reasoning approach [31,32], through a multi-staged, mixed method approach [33,34]. The research involved a review of purposively selected research documents and reports, demographic analysis of existing population data, and scenario and user analyses.…”

Healthcare workers experience of screening older adults in emergency care settings: A qualitative descriptive study using the Theoretical Domains Framework

“…Emergency departments and acute assessment units (AAUs) (Emergency Care Settings) serve as critical access points to vital healthcare services for many patients (Hurley et al, 2019;Weber et al, 2023). Screening for disease or risk factors within these settings can identify individuals requiring specialist intervention, leading to enhancement in both individual and population health outcomes (Barry et al, 2023; Leahy et al, 2023, Weber et al, 2023.…”