Abstract:A single-scale model for reinforced concrete, comprising the plain concrete continuum, reinforcement bars and the bond between them, is used as a basis for deriving a two-scale model. The large-scale problem, representing the "effective" reinforced concrete solid, is enriched by an effective reinforcement slip variable. The subscale problem on a Representative Volume Element (RVE) is defined by Dirichlet boundary conditions. The response of the RVEs of different sizes was investigated by means of pull-out test… Show more
“…Second, the large‐scale mesh dependence of the global response was rather low. Moreover, as the macroscopic strain was prescribed on the RVEs using classical Dirichlet boundary condition, the structural stiffness (and load‐deflection response) was overestimated, which was already observed by the authors in References and . As bond‐slip mechanism is very important only locally (eg, for cracking), it could be expected that its influence on the global structural response will be marginal.…”
Section: Large‐scale Responsementioning
confidence: 84%
“…Because the arrangement of reinforcement in the deep beam corresponded to the one used in RVEs described in Section 4, they were directly used to represent the substructure of the material. It is noteworthy that not only the size of the RVE, but also the size of the macroscopic mesh has influence on the results as shown by the authors in Reference . To this end, five different large‐scale meshes were constructed.…”
Section: Large‐scale Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The so‐called pull‐through tests are structural simulations performed on the RVEs, where the macroscopic slip is gradually increased, so that the reinforcement bars are eventually pulled out from the concrete. Such tests were already performed by the authors in Reference , with the effective reinforcement slip being prescribed at the RVE boundary, but nothing about the subscale variation was specified. It is noteworthy that such formulation did not require any volumetric/subscale definition of the effective variable.…”
Section: Unit Cell Response At Reinforcement Pull‐throughmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mid‐span deflection was measured at the top of the beam, according to Figure , while the external force was computed as the reaction force at the loading platen. For convenience, a result for a single‐scale analysis in full resolution is also presented, cf Reference for more information about the single‐scale model. From the graphs, a few things can be concluded.…”
Section: Large‐scale Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many different multiscale methods suitable for this task. Many of them have already been studied and used in modeling of plain concrete and even reinforced concrete . One method that shows potential is the FE 2 method, which couples the scales in a nested way, that is, the macroscopic response is obtained by computational homogenisation performed on the fine‐scale representative volume elements (RVEs), cf Figure .…”
SUMMARY
A two‐scale model for reinforced concrete, in which the large‐scale problem formulation is enriched by an effective reinforcement slip variable, is derived from the single‐scale model describing the response of plain concrete, reinforcement steel, and the bond between them. The subscale problem on the representative volume element (RVE) is correspondingly defined as finding the response of the RVE subjected to effective variables (strain, slip, and slip gradient) imposed from the large scale. A novel volumetric definition of effective reinforcement slip and its gradient is devised, and the corresponding subscale problem is formulated. The newly defined effective variables are imposed on the RVE in a weak sense using Lagrange multipliers. The response of the RVEs of different sizes was investigated by means of pull‐through tests, and the novel boundary condition type was used in FE2 analyses of a deep beam. Locally, prescribing the macroscopic reinforcement slip and its gradient in the proposed manner resulted in reduced RVE‐size dependency of effective work conjugates, which allows for more objective description of reinforcement slip in two‐scale modeling of reinforced concrete. Globally, this formulation produced more consistent amplitudes of effective slip fluctuations and more consistent maximum crack width predictions.
“…Second, the large‐scale mesh dependence of the global response was rather low. Moreover, as the macroscopic strain was prescribed on the RVEs using classical Dirichlet boundary condition, the structural stiffness (and load‐deflection response) was overestimated, which was already observed by the authors in References and . As bond‐slip mechanism is very important only locally (eg, for cracking), it could be expected that its influence on the global structural response will be marginal.…”
Section: Large‐scale Responsementioning
confidence: 84%
“…Because the arrangement of reinforcement in the deep beam corresponded to the one used in RVEs described in Section 4, they were directly used to represent the substructure of the material. It is noteworthy that not only the size of the RVE, but also the size of the macroscopic mesh has influence on the results as shown by the authors in Reference . To this end, five different large‐scale meshes were constructed.…”
Section: Large‐scale Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The so‐called pull‐through tests are structural simulations performed on the RVEs, where the macroscopic slip is gradually increased, so that the reinforcement bars are eventually pulled out from the concrete. Such tests were already performed by the authors in Reference , with the effective reinforcement slip being prescribed at the RVE boundary, but nothing about the subscale variation was specified. It is noteworthy that such formulation did not require any volumetric/subscale definition of the effective variable.…”
Section: Unit Cell Response At Reinforcement Pull‐throughmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mid‐span deflection was measured at the top of the beam, according to Figure , while the external force was computed as the reaction force at the loading platen. For convenience, a result for a single‐scale analysis in full resolution is also presented, cf Reference for more information about the single‐scale model. From the graphs, a few things can be concluded.…”
Section: Large‐scale Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many different multiscale methods suitable for this task. Many of them have already been studied and used in modeling of plain concrete and even reinforced concrete . One method that shows potential is the FE 2 method, which couples the scales in a nested way, that is, the macroscopic response is obtained by computational homogenisation performed on the fine‐scale representative volume elements (RVEs), cf Figure .…”
SUMMARY
A two‐scale model for reinforced concrete, in which the large‐scale problem formulation is enriched by an effective reinforcement slip variable, is derived from the single‐scale model describing the response of plain concrete, reinforcement steel, and the bond between them. The subscale problem on the representative volume element (RVE) is correspondingly defined as finding the response of the RVE subjected to effective variables (strain, slip, and slip gradient) imposed from the large scale. A novel volumetric definition of effective reinforcement slip and its gradient is devised, and the corresponding subscale problem is formulated. The newly defined effective variables are imposed on the RVE in a weak sense using Lagrange multipliers. The response of the RVEs of different sizes was investigated by means of pull‐through tests, and the novel boundary condition type was used in FE2 analyses of a deep beam. Locally, prescribing the macroscopic reinforcement slip and its gradient in the proposed manner resulted in reduced RVE‐size dependency of effective work conjugates, which allows for more objective description of reinforcement slip in two‐scale modeling of reinforced concrete. Globally, this formulation produced more consistent amplitudes of effective slip fluctuations and more consistent maximum crack width predictions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.