2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2013.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multiscale analysis of elastic contacts and percolation threshold for numerically generated and real rough surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
57
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(4) following the iterative procedure described in [33,34,48], the discretization step must be carefully selected: this must be much smaller than the correlation length for the specific layer thickness under investigation.…”
Section: Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(4) following the iterative procedure described in [33,34,48], the discretization step must be carefully selected: this must be much smaller than the correlation length for the specific layer thickness under investigation.…”
Section: Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variety of the proposed techniques includes finite element methods (FEM) ( [56]), boundary elements methods (BEM) ( [54], [33], [27], [47]), molecular dynamics simulations ( [62], [61], [63]) and hybrid approaches ( [64], [65]). In all these cases, getting the full numerical convergence is a crucial point that deeply influences the reliability of the results (see [48] for a detailed discussion). The actual relation between real contact area and load has been, for example, widely debated since, as shown in [48], it strongly depends on the capability of converging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here, we underline that, once a time-independent formulation is introduced, the problem can be solved by employing the same approach already developed for the linear elastic rough contact problem studied in ( [35], [36], [37]). …”
Section: Numerical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the sliding or rolling contact between rough surfaces involves a very large number of spatial and time scales (covering more than six orders of magnitude), provoking a huge increase of computational cost and making conventional numerical techniques, including finite-element (FE) solvers, unfeasible for this type of investigations. For these reasons, specially designed numerical boundary element methodologies have been developed to address the rough contact problem [1,17,[20][21][22][23][24][25]. On the other hand, different approximate analytic approaches have been proposed to deal with this type of problems, which belong mainly to two categories: (i) mean-field theories [3,5,6,26] and (ii) multi-asperity models [27][28][29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%