1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)60861-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multipoint Method for Spindle Error Motion Measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, neither the probes nor the artifact are moved, but all must be properly arranged to measure the same track on the artifact [13,[16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Standard Error Separation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, neither the probes nor the artifact are moved, but all must be properly arranged to measure the same track on the artifact [13,[16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Standard Error Separation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Multi-probe method: this method uses at least three probes to simultaneously measure error components. In this case, neither the probes nor the artifact are moved, but all must be properly arranged to measure the same track on the artifact [13,[16][17][18][19][20]. • Multi-step method: this method requires many measurements for each spindle error component.…”
Section: éTalon éTalon éTalon éTalon éTalonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the edge shape is expected to vary as a function of the product shape and mass. The multi-probe method [19,20] was hereto selected as an in-process calibration method. Extensive simulations have shown that sufficient accuracy can be obtained with this method [1], but quality of the air-bearing spindle is such that implementation in practice has not yet been done.…”
Section: Lower Metrology Framementioning
confidence: 99%