2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multiple-task gait analysis approach: Kinematic, kinetic and EMG reference data for healthy young and adult subjects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
219
1
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 309 publications
(237 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
14
219
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These biomechanical differences should not be attributed to walking speed, as speed did not differ across time for any of the experimental conditions ( Table 2). The present data are comparable to similar previously collected data, 12,[27][28][29][30] indicating that our data-collection and -analysis methods were appropriate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…These biomechanical differences should not be attributed to walking speed, as speed did not differ across time for any of the experimental conditions ( Table 2). The present data are comparable to similar previously collected data, 12,[27][28][29][30] indicating that our data-collection and -analysis methods were appropriate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…We considered the public dataset of Bovi et al (2011). This is a comprehensive dataset including 3D multi-joint kinematics, kinetics and EMG for a variety of gait-related tasks from 40 healthy subjects subcategorised into 20 "young" (aged 6-17) and 20 "adult" (aged 22-72).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to this, classical hypothesis testing of EMG time-series tends to involve the extraction of summarizing scalar parameters of individual muscles [Houck, 2003] and qualitative interpretation [e.g. Bovi et al, 2011, Koshland et al, 2005. Scalar or qualitative analyses fail to consider the characteristics of inter-muscle dependence or time dependence in EMG time-series.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This diversity causes segmentation of the whole group, e.g. in the study performed in [4], there is a segmentation of the group in two different range of ages. One group included subjects from 22 to 72 years old, meanwhile, the subjects from the other group have ages ranged from 6 to 17 years old.…”
Section: Gait Analysis Datamentioning
confidence: 99%