2014
DOI: 10.1109/tcsii.2014.2304893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multiple-Stage Parallel Replica-Bitline Delay Addition Technique for Reducing Timing Variation of SRAM Sense Amplifiers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen, the standard deviation of SAE timing generated by pipelined circuit obtains 69.45% improvement compared with that generated by conventional circuit, owing to 235.89 ps reduction. Generally, the delay time of the SAE timing occupies about half of the cycle time [5,6,7,9,10]; hence, the conventional cycle time is 10.52 ns (ð6:26 À 1Þ ns  2). According to [5,6,7,9,10], three-sigma (3) variation existing is assumed for the SAE timing margin; thus, the SAE timing margin is reduced from 2.038 ns (3  2) to 0.623 ns by applying the proposed circuit.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As can be seen, the standard deviation of SAE timing generated by pipelined circuit obtains 69.45% improvement compared with that generated by conventional circuit, owing to 235.89 ps reduction. Generally, the delay time of the SAE timing occupies about half of the cycle time [5,6,7,9,10]; hence, the conventional cycle time is 10.52 ns (ð6:26 À 1Þ ns  2). According to [5,6,7,9,10], three-sigma (3) variation existing is assumed for the SAE timing margin; thus, the SAE timing margin is reduced from 2.038 ns (3  2) to 0.623 ns by applying the proposed circuit.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the final standard deviation of proposed SAE timing can be expressed as ffiffiffiffi ffi M p Conv =N. Especially, assume that N remains constant, when M ¼ 1, the standard deviation of proposed SAE timing is also equal to Conv =K, which is the same as that with parallel replica-bitline Delay addition (MPRDA) technique [10]. The major difference (e.g.…”
Section: Proposed Pipelined Rbl Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If the SAE arrives early before the bitline voltage difference reaches the SA offset, a read failure may happen. By contrast, unnecessary access time and power consumption will be increased [2][3][4][5]. Generally, the SAE signal is self-timed using the replica bitline (RBL) technique, since it tracks bitline delay better than simple inverter chains [2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [4], with the usage of K times RCs in a replica column and timing multiplier circuit (TMC), a digitised RBL delay (digitised-RBD) technique has been developed. The disadvantage of this scheme is that the quantisation noise as well as the area of the TMC becomes larger as the count of RCs increases [5]. With the RBL segmented into M stages and K times RCs used in each stage, another technique called multiple-stage parallel RBL delay addition is proposed in [5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%