2014
DOI: 10.1109/twc.2014.022114.131948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multiobjective Optimization Approach for Optimal Link Adaptation of OFDM-Based Cognitive Radio Systems with Imperfect Spectrum Sensing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [14], authors used the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm to solve a joint uplink resource allocation problem for cognitive networks under the consideration of imperfect spectrum sensing. In [15], a multi-objective optimization problem that jointly considered the femtocell throughput maximization and transmit power minimization was formulated, subject to interference constraints on both femtocell and macrocell including the co-channel interference and adjacent channel interference constraints under spectrum sensing error probabilities. In [16], pricing and power allocation strategies were studied in a two-tier femtocell network with the aim of maximizing energy efficiency, where both perfect and imperfect spectrum sensing cases were considered.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [14], authors used the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm to solve a joint uplink resource allocation problem for cognitive networks under the consideration of imperfect spectrum sensing. In [15], a multi-objective optimization problem that jointly considered the femtocell throughput maximization and transmit power minimization was formulated, subject to interference constraints on both femtocell and macrocell including the co-channel interference and adjacent channel interference constraints under spectrum sensing error probabilities. In [16], pricing and power allocation strategies were studied in a two-tier femtocell network with the aim of maximizing energy efficiency, where both perfect and imperfect spectrum sensing cases were considered.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the aforementioned solutions, jointly considered subchannel allocation and power allocation are a proper way to solve resource allocation problems. The objectives of resource allocation mainly focus on interference management [9,10,12,13,[19][20][21][22], capacity enhancement [8,10,13,15,[20][21][22], power efficiency improvement [15,16,19], and fairness [10,12]. However, to the best of our knowledge, resource allocation for cognitive femtocell network jointly considering interference management, fairness, imperfect spectrum sensing, and interference uncertainty has not been studied in previous works.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, φ n L (p n ) represents the average rate loss due to sensing errors or collision with PU transmission. Another utility function that uses concepts of multi-objective optimization to maximize the transmission rate with the least amount of transmit power is defined as [11,22] …”
Section: Utility Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the weighting coefficients w 1 and w 2 include normalization factors such that the competing objectives are within the same range, and hence, the metric in (19) is dimensionless [11]. It is worthy to mention that if the circuity power is considered in this metric, the optimal EE solution can be achieved at certain values of w 1 and w 2 [4].…”
Section: Utility Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sophisticated techniques such as multi-objective optimization have recently been explored for inspecting the interrelationships among heterogenous objectives such as achievable spectral efficiency and energy/power consumption [13]- [15]. Furthermore, fast and distributed techniques like message-passing and belief-propagation have been considered for devising effective spectrum access protocols and interference coordination among coexisting services [16], [17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%