Proceedings of the 2000 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC00 (Cat. No.00TH8512)
DOI: 10.1109/cec.2000.870312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multiobjective genetic algorithm for radio network optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
72
0
3

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
72
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…They seek the optimal tradeoff (or Pareto-optimal) solutions and have no weight parameters to manually configure in their fitness functions [15][16][17][18]. Unlike existing MOGAs, EVOLT is designed to handle high-dimensional parameter and objective spaces well, minimize the number of manually-configured constants in genetic operators and visualize non-dominated individuals in a low-dimensional (two dimensional) SOM space.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They seek the optimal tradeoff (or Pareto-optimal) solutions and have no weight parameters to manually configure in their fitness functions [15][16][17][18]. Unlike existing MOGAs, EVOLT is designed to handle high-dimensional parameter and objective spaces well, minimize the number of manually-configured constants in genetic operators and visualize non-dominated individuals in a low-dimensional (two dimensional) SOM space.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High dimensionality in the objective space often leads to premature convergence, which fails to improve the optimization quality (or optimality) of QoS parameter sets. Traditional QoS optimization algorithms tend to deal with a limited number of parameters and optimization objectives; for example, less than 20 QoS parameters and three or less optimization objectives 1 [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the hypervolume metric is available both in its unary [51] and its binary [52] form. Moreover, the entropy metric [5], the contribution metric [35] as well as the additive and the multiplicative ε-indicators [52] are all implemented and can thus be used to compare two sets of solutions. Besides, some implementations for pairwise comparison of solutions (that are then usable within the binary indicator-based fitness assignment schemes, see Sect.…”
Section: Stopping Criteria Checkpointing and Statistical Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively in the fixed-structure genotype camp, a genotype would One noticeable exception to this is the "multi-level encoding" in Meunier at al. [9]. In their model, the BS site activation, antenna type selection, and antenna configuration are encoded as three levels.…”
Section: Individual Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%