2004
DOI: 10.1037/1040-3590.16.2.155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multigroup Item Response Theory Analysis of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised.

Abstract: Item response theory was used to investigate the functioning of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R; R. D. Hare, 1991, 2003) in several offender populations. With male criminal offenders (N=3,847) as a reference group, differential item functioning analyses were performed for 3 comparison groups: female criminal offenders (N=1,219), male forensic psychiatric patients (N=1,246), and male criminal offenders scored from file reviews (N=2,626). Results are discussed in the context of the 2-factor, 4-facet mod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

20
227
2
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(253 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
20
227
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Criteria that demonstrate DCF need not reflect bias or variance across subgroups if the DCF occurs in opposing directions (e.g., some criteria result in greater discrimination or severity among men while others demonstrate the opposite effect) (Cooke et al 2001;Bolt et al 2004). Whether DCF actually reflects invariance across subgroups can be determined if the observed criterion-level DCFs cancel out at the total test (scale) score level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Criteria that demonstrate DCF need not reflect bias or variance across subgroups if the DCF occurs in opposing directions (e.g., some criteria result in greater discrimination or severity among men while others demonstrate the opposite effect) (Cooke et al 2001;Bolt et al 2004). Whether DCF actually reflects invariance across subgroups can be determined if the observed criterion-level DCFs cancel out at the total test (scale) score level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Lord (1952) initially emphasized the importance of the unidimensionality assumption, more recent evidence has shown that with sufficient sample sizes and the dominance of one dimension, IRT parameter estimates are stable and accurately represent the underlying data (Reckase, 1979;Dragow and Parsons, 1983;Harrison, 1986;Hambleton, 1989;Drasgow and Hulin, 1990). However, the parameters of the IRT model are most interpretable when the criteria reflect a single unitary dimension (Stout, 1987;Downing, 2003;Bolt et al 2004;Krueger et al 2004). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these reasons the term psychopathic in our article refers to people with a PCL-R score of at least 30, an extreme score obtained by about 15% of the male offenders, and 10% of the female offenders, described by Hare. 20 Nonetheless, we note that there are ethnic and sex differences in the functioning of individual PCL-R items [34][35][36][37] and in the external correlates of the PCL-R and other measures of psychopathy. 4,7,20,39 The patterning and significance of these differences are the subject of much of the current empirical research on psychopathy.…”
Section: Pcl-r Assessment Of Psychopathymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IRT analyses indicate that PCL-R scores in the upper range (around 30) appear to reflect much the same level of psychopathy in North American male offenders as they do in female offenders, male forensic psychiatric patients, male offenders assessed from file reviews, and European male offenders and forensic psychiatric patients. [34][35][36] Similarly, IRT analyses 37 and a meta-analytic review 38 indicate that the PCL-R total scores function similarly in African-American and Caucasian offenders and patients. For these reasons the term psychopathic in our article refers to people with a PCL-R score of at least 30, an extreme score obtained by about 15% of the male offenders, and 10% of the female offenders, described by Hare.…”
Section: Pcl-r Assessment Of Psychopathymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interpersonal and affective features were described as the core factors of the ''psychopathic personality'' [8,32] and research with adults suggested that these were the most distinctive and defining aspects of the disorder [13]. Studies with male offenders [5,13,14] examined the item response theory (IRT) to test item functioning and concluded that the interpersonal/affective dimension was generally more discriminating and provided more information about the construct than behavioral items. Vincent and Hart utilized the IRT with adolescent boys: Their findings indicated that psychopathy in adolescent boys was a coherent construct and that there were some similarities in item functioning between male adolescents and adults [76].…”
Section: J Psychopathy In Youthmentioning
confidence: 99%