2002
DOI: 10.1006/jasc.2001.0750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multidisciplinary Approach to Understanding the Initial Introduction of Maize into Coastal Ecuador

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
71
1
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
71
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These dates from Panama are not surprising, given that several studies and different archaeobotanical datasets show that maize reached sites in Colombia and Ecuador between 8000 and 7500 cal BP (6,11,12,36). Views that maize dispersals occurred later (37,38) are not supported by our starch and other microfossil data from Panama.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…These dates from Panama are not surprising, given that several studies and different archaeobotanical datasets show that maize reached sites in Colombia and Ecuador between 8000 and 7500 cal BP (6,11,12,36). Views that maize dispersals occurred later (37,38) are not supported by our starch and other microfossil data from Panama.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…(4,6). Despite this, others have concluded from their research that maize was not introduced into coastal Ecuador until Ϸ4150-3850 cal B.P., was used first and foremost in ceremonial contexts as a fermented beverage, and was not important in everyday subsistence (11,12). Further, some question the dependability of associated dates for documenting the presence of maize and the timing of its dispersal from Mexico (13); thus, our results are pertinent to this debate as well.…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…9 and 10 for a review of the data). **The suggestion that maize moved into northern South America shortly before 4,000 cal BP, based on phytoliths recovered from a small sample of early fourth millennium BP pottery from Ecuador (63), is unsupportable in light of the accumulated data. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%