2014
DOI: 10.1002/2014jf003135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multidimensional stability model for predicting shallow landslide size and shape across landscapes

Abstract: The size of a shallow landslide is a fundamental control on both its hazard and geomorphic importance. Existing models are either unable to predict landslide size or are computationally intensive such that they cannot practically be applied across landscapes. We derive a model appropriate for natural slopes that is capable of predicting shallow landslide size but simple enough to be applied over entire watersheds. It accounts for lateral resistance by representing the forces acting on each margin of potential … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
128
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
7
128
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 6 shows that when the topsoil stratum is thin it can remain stable even for very low values of effective cohesion, whereas, thicker soils tend to require a much higher effective cohesion for stability. This result is in keeping with other physically based modelling studies of the relationships between the geometry of slopes, strata and shallow landslides in cohesion controlled slopes (Frattini and Crosta, 2013;Milledge et al, 2014). Ignoring the effects of water table location and pore water pressures, the greater self-weight of soil at the base of a thicker soil stratum generates higher shear stresses and requires greater shear resistance for stability than in a shallower soil.…”
Section: Preparatory and Triggering Factors Driving Slope Instabilitysupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Figure 6 shows that when the topsoil stratum is thin it can remain stable even for very low values of effective cohesion, whereas, thicker soils tend to require a much higher effective cohesion for stability. This result is in keeping with other physically based modelling studies of the relationships between the geometry of slopes, strata and shallow landslides in cohesion controlled slopes (Frattini and Crosta, 2013;Milledge et al, 2014). Ignoring the effects of water table location and pore water pressures, the greater self-weight of soil at the base of a thicker soil stratum generates higher shear stresses and requires greater shear resistance for stability than in a shallower soil.…”
Section: Preparatory and Triggering Factors Driving Slope Instabilitysupporting
confidence: 69%
“…In compression, following the work of Schwarz et al (2015) we assume that the soil compressional resistance is mobilized across the shear plane that forms during the failure of a downslope wedge, similar to the earth pressure force in the geotechnical engineering literature that develops during the passive state when a retaining wall moves downslope toward the adjacent backfill (e.g., Milledge et al, 2014). According to Schwarz et al (2015), the mobilized force on the downslope wedge scales with the maximum passive earth pressure force F p and with the displacement, i.e.,…”
Section: Bond Forces Due To Soilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the large majority of cases, slope stability models add apparent cohesion to the soil to simulate root reinforcement (e.g., Milledge et al, 2014;Bellugi et al, 2015;Hwang et al, 2015). Few models include the effects of root distribution heterogeneity (Stokes et al, 2014), and none consider the stress-strain behavior of root reinforcement and the strength of roots in compression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fiber reinforcement provided by tree roots increases riverbank shear strength (Abernethy and Rutherfurd, 2001). Even when this root reinforcement has limited depth penetration, increased friction along the edges of a potential slide mass can control the size of individual failure events (e.g., slump blocks) (Milledge et al, 2014;Wang et al, 2016): the greater the root reinforcement, the larger the individual failure events. By extension, deforestation will tend to decrease the size of individual failure events, but the reduced shear strength of riverbank materials will tend to increase their frequency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%