2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-12255-3_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multicriteria View About Judicial and Legislative Decision Making in Digital Cities and Societies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this sense, there have been efforts in bringing more proximity between government and citizens [84][85][86]. Connected by a new era of information technologies, the SC drives a strong trend for decentralizing democracies [87], as mentioned by Roberts (2004) [88]. Decentralizing the decision-making process implies distributing decisions, a strategy that has been mainly adopted using the paradigm of Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) [89,90] concepts.…”
Section: Decentralized Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this sense, there have been efforts in bringing more proximity between government and citizens [84][85][86]. Connected by a new era of information technologies, the SC drives a strong trend for decentralizing democracies [87], as mentioned by Roberts (2004) [88]. Decentralizing the decision-making process implies distributing decisions, a strategy that has been mainly adopted using the paradigm of Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) [89,90] concepts.…”
Section: Decentralized Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is expected, in terms of democratic innovation, is a shared decision-making process that means expanding the civil autonomy and public relations [100]. This provides space for e-government [101], and even possibilities of Internet voting [102,103], legislative and juridical decision-making [87,104] and public petitioning.…”
Section: Decentralized Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these changes have potential to strengthen open spaces for discussions and to increase the number of citizens interested in participating in web politics [17]. Coelho et al [18] described a system that could handle legislative and judicial processes with social participation throughout a multi-criteria analysis of all persons involved in the process. However, no work from the literature has yet tackled how this modern concept of digital interaction can be boosted in a direct way to motivate society to handle the economic aspects of the current political administration.…”
Section: Internet and The Rise Of E-governancementioning
confidence: 99%