2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.03.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multicriteria Analysis for the Green VRP: A Case Discussion for the Distribution Problem of a Spanish Retailer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, when public transportation systems are considered, cost and speed is another trade-off handled when citizens use transport integration [38]. The resolution of problems in the scope of green logistics is under discussion not only by the academia [39][40][41][42] but also by the industry [43,44], which basically involve different models for calculating the cost of the routes, involving other components in the objective function equation, such as carbon emissions [45,46]. Discussions under the scope of autonomous also involve batteries and fuel cell based equipment [47].…”
Section: Smart Routing Problems: Multi-objective Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, when public transportation systems are considered, cost and speed is another trade-off handled when citizens use transport integration [38]. The resolution of problems in the scope of green logistics is under discussion not only by the academia [39][40][41][42] but also by the industry [43,44], which basically involve different models for calculating the cost of the routes, involving other components in the objective function equation, such as carbon emissions [45,46]. Discussions under the scope of autonomous also involve batteries and fuel cell based equipment [47].…”
Section: Smart Routing Problems: Multi-objective Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the prospect decision matrix, Equations (4)-(6), and Equations (8) and (9), and considering the loss aversion psychology and risk attitude of each expert, the normalized individual prospect value matrix of alternative i for three decision makers are as follows (Tables 4-6). According to Equations (6) and (7), the consensuses of the three alternatives were 0.9960, 0.9962, and 0.9959, which are all greater than the common thresholds of 0.9 (β = 0.9) and 0.95 (β = 0.95). The higher level of consensus shows the credibility of the decision making process.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Sixth, calculate the consensus degree based on the CPC. Use Equation (5) to aggregate the decision matrices V k ij of all the DMs, and then, calculate the CPC for each alternative through Equations (6) and (7). Seventh, according to the consensus degree threshold, adjust the difference or disagreement attribute to satisfy the accepted threshold.…”
Section: Dual Group Decision Fusion Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing works have covered vehicle routing problem (VRP) optimization and the profit distribution strategy [6,7]. These studies, however, mostly overlooked the coordination and cooperation process among commodity suppliers, logistics providers and customers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%