2012
DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multicenter Application and Evaluation of the Oxford Classification of IgA Nephropathy in Adult Chinese Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

10
111
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
10
111
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The original Oxford study 1 and several subsequent validation studies [3][4][5][6]15 with similar entry criteria, excluding patients with eGFR,30 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 at the time of biopsy and/or rapid progression to ESRD, did not find crescents to be an independent predictor of poor renal outcomes in patients with IgA nephropathy. However, some other studies with less restrictive entry criteria 7-10 did find a significant association between crescents and a composite outcome including either ESRD or doubling of SCr/$50% reduction in eGFR (in one instance, also including death).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The original Oxford study 1 and several subsequent validation studies [3][4][5][6]15 with similar entry criteria, excluding patients with eGFR,30 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 at the time of biopsy and/or rapid progression to ESRD, did not find crescents to be an independent predictor of poor renal outcomes in patients with IgA nephropathy. However, some other studies with less restrictive entry criteria 7-10 did find a significant association between crescents and a composite outcome including either ESRD or doubling of SCr/$50% reduction in eGFR (in one instance, also including death).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Endocapillary hypercellularity (E), although not predictive of poor outcome in the Oxford cohort, was associated with a significantly reduced rate of eGFR decline in patients treated with immunosuppressive therapy compared with those who were not. The Oxford Classification is, thus, composed of scores for M, E, S, and T. However, the presence or absence of cellular/fibrocellular crescents was not a significant predictor of these outcomes in the original Oxford cohort 1 or a number of validation studies [3][4][5][6] with similar entry criteria, which excluded patients with eGFR of ,30 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 at the time of biopsy and/or progression to ESRD within 12 months of the biopsy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of note, the present study did not show the independent association of renal outcomes with M or E lesion discrepant from previous validation studies of Oxford classification. 15,27,28 These observations might be partly arisen from the relatively low proportion of E1 lesion and the small number of corticosteroid users compared with previous studies. Most of the patients were treated with ACEi or ARBs during the follow-up regardless of pathological grade.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…However, their score has not been verified in an independent validation cohort. Furthermore, none of these previously published risk scores used an internationally accepted pathologic grading system, such as the Oxford classification (12,14,31). To our knowledge, our study is the first investigation attempting to develop a risk score using the Oxford classification and to verify its external validity in an independent cohort.…”
Section: Variables Scoresmentioning
confidence: 97%