2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multiaxial high-cycle fatigue life evaluation model for notched structural components

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Liu et al also introduced a method to consider the impact of the stress field on fatigue life by coupling the TCD with FEA. To begin with, a critical plane is set as the plane with the maximal shear stress range, and the damage parameters are the maximal effective shear stress amplitude as well as the maximum effective normal stress, which can be calculated by averaging the stress in the hemisphere volume around the peak stress point (using the VM of the TCD with critical radius 1.54 L to define the fatigue process zone): τR=1Vf()τitalicdv, σn,FI=1Vf()σnitalicdv. …”
Section: Weighting Control Parameters–based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu et al also introduced a method to consider the impact of the stress field on fatigue life by coupling the TCD with FEA. To begin with, a critical plane is set as the plane with the maximal shear stress range, and the damage parameters are the maximal effective shear stress amplitude as well as the maximum effective normal stress, which can be calculated by averaging the stress in the hemisphere volume around the peak stress point (using the VM of the TCD with critical radius 1.54 L to define the fatigue process zone): τR=1Vf()τitalicdv, σn,FI=1Vf()σnitalicdv. …”
Section: Weighting Control Parameters–based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23,24,[27][28][29] However, most of the multiaxial fatigue damage models include additional material constants, which make them inconvenient for practical engineering application. 23,24,[27][28][29] However, most of the multiaxial fatigue damage models include additional material constants, which make them inconvenient for practical engineering application.…”
Section: Multiaxial Fatigue Damage Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many multiaxial fatigue damage models, which are based on the critical plane concept, have been presented. 23,24,[27][28][29] However, most of the multiaxial fatigue damage models include additional material constants, which make them inconvenient for practical engineering application. Shang and Wang 30 proposed a multiaxial fatigue damage model, in which the normal strain excursion ε * n À Á between adjacent turning points of the largest shear strain and the largest shear strain amplitude (Δγ max /2) in association with the critical plane are considered as 2 parameters controlling multiaxial fatigue damage.…”
Section: Multiaxial Fatigue Damage Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, several nonlocal approaches have been put forward to interpret the notch effect on the fatigue lifetime. [50][51][52][53] The common strategy is the CDTs, in which the PM and the LM can be formalized as…”
Section: Theories Of Critical Distancementioning
confidence: 99%