2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrtpm.2020.100195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-state train-following model for the analysis of virtual coupling railway operations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
82
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
82
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Quaglietta et. al [20], [21] introduce a detailed capacity analysis of the VC concept which upgrades moving-block train operations by imposing a relative braking distance separation rather than an absolute one. The proposed car-following based model considers non-linear train dynamics and relevant factors such as motion resistances due to track gradient and curvature as well as power limitations of the traction unit and safety constraints at junctions.…”
Section: B Control Methods Of the Train Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quaglietta et. al [20], [21] introduce a detailed capacity analysis of the VC concept which upgrades moving-block train operations by imposing a relative braking distance separation rather than an absolute one. The proposed car-following based model considers non-linear train dynamics and relevant factors such as motion resistances due to track gradient and curvature as well as power limitations of the traction unit and safety constraints at junctions.…”
Section: B Control Methods Of the Train Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flammini et al (2019) proposed a quantitative model to analyse the effects of introducing Virtual Coupling according to the extension of the current ETCS Level 3 standard, by maintaining the backward compatibility with the information exchanged between trains and the trackside infrastructure [8]. In a further work, Quaglietta et al [3] developed a trainfollowing model to describe train operations under VC and assess capacity performance under different operational settings.…”
Section: Virtual Coupling Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second scenario envisions an ETCS L3 moving-block service with a headway reduction of 50% compared to the baseline scenario that considers multi-aspect signalling on main line, regional and urban market segments. For high-speed railways, the base configuration is ETCS L2 with a headway reduction of 47% if ETCS L3 is implemented [3]. Preliminary percentages have been derived/estimated together with railway experts across Europe for the other three scenarios of VC-enabled services.…”
Section: Virtual Coupling Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A control law including a communication delay time was designed, and Yalmip tools were used to solve the controller parameters corresponding to the optimal convergence speed [10]. In [11], virtual coupling capacity was compared with the traditional communication-based train control (CBTC) signal system, and the results demonstrated this capacity via virtual coupling gains under various operational scenarios. In [12], a model predictive control (MPC) method was used to design a train formation following controller, and a simulation study of Ho Chi Minh City Line 1 was conducted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%