2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2015.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multi-State Physics Modeling approach for the reliability assessment of Nuclear Power Plants piping systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The test blanket module port plug (TBM PP) consists of a TBM frame and two TBM-sets. For the TBM PP, the neutron flux is about 1E?11 cm -2 s -1 [20]. The HCCB TBM will be gradually tested in four operation phases of ITER.…”
Section: The Radiation Damage Correction Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The test blanket module port plug (TBM PP) consists of a TBM frame and two TBM-sets. For the TBM PP, the neutron flux is about 1E?11 cm -2 s -1 [20]. The HCCB TBM will be gradually tested in four operation phases of ITER.…”
Section: The Radiation Damage Correction Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several different methods that have been applied to estimation of pipe failure rates, such as the maximum likelihood estimate (MLE) method, the probabilistic fracture mechanics (PFM) method, the expert judgment method, and the Markov Chain Model (MCM) method [16][17][18][19][20]. However, the operating environments and conditions known to affect reliability of pipe were not considered in the above methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the manufacturing, production, power generation and oil and/or gas transportation systems, whose overall performance can be settled on different levels ( e.g. 100%, 80%, 50% of the nominal capacity), depending on their operating conditions of their constitutive multi-state elements [12,31,24,34,44,9]. These phenomena make it cumbersome to suffice increasingly stringent requirements for accurate reliability assessment using traditional binary reliability methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The widespread recognition of MSS is that it has been defined as having different performance levels and/or some failure modes with corresponding effects on the system's entire performance. Many researchers have made various contributions for the MSS reliability evaluation and modeling theory recently [13,23,8,9,27,40]. The commonly adopted methods have five basic approaches, such as, an extension of binary theory to MSS cases, the stochastic process approach, the universal generating function (UGF), the Monte-Carlo simulation and recursive algorithm etc [14,45,22,19,2,20,37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MSPM is a semi-Markov modeling framework that allows inserting physical knowledge on the system failure process, for improving the system reliability assessment by accounting for the effects of both the stochastic degradation process and the uncertain environmental and operational parameters (Unwin et al, 2011;Di Maio et al, 2015;Lin et al, 2015;Wang et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%