2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2015.04.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-perspective dynamic network performance efficiency measurement of an evacuation: A dynamic network-DEA approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…() and Andersson et al. () and an evacuation analysis conducted by Herrera‐Restrepo () could not be identified among the studies by Liu et al. ().…”
Section: Evolution Of the Ddea Literaturementioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…() and Andersson et al. () and an evacuation analysis conducted by Herrera‐Restrepo () could not be identified among the studies by Liu et al. ().…”
Section: Evolution Of the Ddea Literaturementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Our literature review allows us to identify the DEA Solver Pro software as the most popular tool used in application papers (Škrinjarić, ; Avkiran, ; Herrera‐Restrepo et al., ). Indeed, DDEA models can also be modeled and solved by different optimization tools, requiring the user to write down the model in the appropriated languages required by the solvers.…”
Section: Evolution Of the Ddea Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some scholars have used phased DEA to evaluate the energy and transfer efficiencies of transport [30,31]. Furthermore, a network DEA model was used to evaluate the performance level of India's public transport sector and traffic system [32,33]. However, we find that the DEA method as used by the above-mentioned studies still fails to avoid the truncation drawbacks, i.e., they are impossible to accurately measure the efficiency of the effective evaluation unit of DEA and the input-output redundancy cannot be solved at the same time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we find that the DEA method as used by the above-mentioned studies still fails to avoid the truncation drawbacks, i.e., they are impossible to accurately measure the efficiency of the effective evaluation unit of DEA and the input-output redundancy cannot be solved at the same time. The undesired output of the super-slacks-based measurement-data envelopment analysis (US-SBM-DEA) model put forward by Cheng can better solve the problems arising from the above [28][29][30][31][32][33] efficiency measurement methods. Then this model has been widely used in the efficiency evaluation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%