2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2019.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-objective genetic algorithm for a special type of 2D orthogonal packing problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In conclusion, the paper method significantly improves the denoised effect for CT image of advanced COVID-19 with non-symptom to a certain extent by different noisy density. Aiming at the different kinds of COVID-19 CT imagesadaptive hybrid genetic combined with exponential simulated annealing [41] (AHG+ESA)orthogonal adaptive genetic [42] combined with rapid simulated annealing [43] (OAG+RSA)traditional adaptive genetic [44] combined with exponential simulated annealing (TAG+ESA)adaptive hybrid genetic combined with doppler effect simulated annealing (AHG+DESA, paper method) are used for simulation comparison tests of denoising parameters optimization. The fitness evolution curve for different COVID-19 CT images are shown in Fig.14 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conclusion, the paper method significantly improves the denoised effect for CT image of advanced COVID-19 with non-symptom to a certain extent by different noisy density. Aiming at the different kinds of COVID-19 CT imagesadaptive hybrid genetic combined with exponential simulated annealing [41] (AHG+ESA)orthogonal adaptive genetic [42] combined with rapid simulated annealing [43] (OAG+RSA)traditional adaptive genetic [44] combined with exponential simulated annealing (TAG+ESA)adaptive hybrid genetic combined with doppler effect simulated annealing (AHG+DESA, paper method) are used for simulation comparison tests of denoising parameters optimization. The fitness evolution curve for different COVID-19 CT images are shown in Fig.14 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traveling Salesman [92] Traveling Salesman [93] Multiple Traveling Salesman [94] Bottleneck Traveling Salesman [95] Cutting Stock [96] Cutting Stock [97] 2D Cutting [98] Packing [99] Packing [100] 2D Packing [101] Bin Packing [102] Knapsack [103] Knapsack [104] Subset Sum [105] Unbounded Knapsack [105] Bounded Knapsack [106] Multiple Knapsack [107] Quadratic Knapsack [108] Scheduling [109] Scheduling [110] Production Scheduling [111] Workforce Scheduling [112] Job-Shop Scheduling [113] Precedence Constrained Scheduling [114] Educational Timetabling [115] Educational Timetabling [116] Facility Location [117] Assignment [118] Quadratic Assignment [119] Spanning Tree [120] Maximum Leaf Spanning Tree [121] Degree Constrained Spanning Tree [122] Minimum Spanning Tree [123] Boolean Satisfiability [124] Boolean Satisfiability [125] Covering [126] Minimum Vertex Cover [127] Set Cover [128] Exact Cover [129] Minimum Edge Cover [130] Vehicle Routing [131] Vehicle Routing…”
Section: Type Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%