2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.mar.2005.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-method approach to building causal performance maps from expert knowledge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
86
0
8

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
86
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Techniques such as the balanced scorecard (Kaplan & Norton, 1996), causal performance maps (Abernethy, Horne, Lillis, Malina & Selto, 2005), performance pyramids (Lynch & Cross, 1992), and activity-based costing (Kaplan & Cooper, 1998) provide more elaborate, detailed and comprehensive data. These systems attempt to make accounting information a more complete and more relevant description of underlying organizational activities.…”
Section: The Role Of Accounting Information In Developing Knowledge Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Techniques such as the balanced scorecard (Kaplan & Norton, 1996), causal performance maps (Abernethy, Horne, Lillis, Malina & Selto, 2005), performance pyramids (Lynch & Cross, 1992), and activity-based costing (Kaplan & Cooper, 1998) provide more elaborate, detailed and comprehensive data. These systems attempt to make accounting information a more complete and more relevant description of underlying organizational activities.…”
Section: The Role Of Accounting Information In Developing Knowledge Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific SFs of a company are integrated into a cause-and-effect network. Each factor can directly or indirectly be linked with the company's financial performance [8][9][10]. A cause-and-effect relationship will only be defined as causal, if a strong correlation between cause(s) and effect(s) exists and the cause of action temporally precedes the effect.…”
Section: Performance Management and Performance Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The direction of an arrow implies the assumed causality. Thus, a causal map can be interpreted as a cognitive map, which describes the process of performances in a company [8]. But, a cognitive map is always constructed from a single individual, whereas a causal map can also represent the cause-and-effect relationships as an aggregated result of several individuals [35].…”
Section: Types Of Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations