2016 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/biocas.2016.7833820
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-core reconfigurable architecture for ultra-low power bio-signal analysis

Abstract: Abstract-This paper introduces a novel computing architecture devoted to the ultra-low power analysis of multiple biosignals. Its structure comprises several processors interfaced with a shared acceleration resource, implemented as a Coarse Grained Reconfigurable Array (CGRA). The CGRA supports the efficient execution of the computationally intensive kernels present in this application domain, while requiring a low reconfiguration overhead. The run-time behavior of the resulting heterogeneous system is orchest… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar conclusion is drawn in [4] and [5], which propose an embedded platform for bio-signal processing in personal health monitors, an increasingly relevant domain with ultra-low power constraints [8]. Similarly to us, [5] describes a CGRA with multi-DP RCs operating in SIMD (single instruction-multiple data) mode.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar conclusion is drawn in [4] and [5], which propose an embedded platform for bio-signal processing in personal health monitors, an increasingly relevant domain with ultra-low power constraints [8]. Similarly to us, [5] describes a CGRA with multi-DP RCs operating in SIMD (single instruction-multiple data) mode.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…7 compares the energy consumption of the part of the workload that is accelerated for the two considered benchmarks. Again, three architectural choices are considered: a multi-processor platform [2], that does not embed a reconfigurable mesh; a platform that couples a multi-core platform with a single-DP CGRA [4]; and our proposed system, featuring an i-DPs accelerator. It can be noted that, even in the two latter cases, certain software overhead is required for setting up, launching and retrieving the outputs of an acceleration request.…”
Section: B Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, we instead concurrently support requests by different cores, either in a Multiple-Instruction / Multiple-Data (MIMD) or in a SIMD fashion. As opposed to [46], which only considers SIMD at the multi-processor level, our paper investigates the benefits of also supporting SIMD-kernels, adopting a multi-datapath CGRA.…”
Section: State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the execution of SIMD kernels is not supported, and SIMD acceleration requests are mapped on different CGRA regions. This setup corresponds to the platform described in [46].…”
Section: B Target and Baseline Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CGRA they constructed had the additional benefit of being able to powerdown sections of the CGRA when unused to extend battery life. Another biomedical CGRA was introduced by Duch et al [158], and uses a mesh-like composition and a 1 MHz clock-frequency to accelerate electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis kernels.…”
Section: F Low-power Cgrasmentioning
confidence: 99%