2006
DOI: 10.1197/j.jht.2006.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multi-center Study Comparing Two Styles of Orthoses for Individuals with Thumb Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
28
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
28
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Seven studies assessed the effectiveness of splints (14, 17, 42, 44–47), 3 assessed the effectiveness of exercises (16, 43, 48), and 2 assessed the effectiveness of a combination of splints and exercises (15, 49). Six studies compared splints of different design (42, 44–47, 49), and 3 studies included a control group that did not use any splint (14, 17, 45). Two of the exercise studies compared exercise versus treatment as usual (43, 48), while the third exercise study compared exercise with a sham hand cream (16).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Seven studies assessed the effectiveness of splints (14, 17, 42, 44–47), 3 assessed the effectiveness of exercises (16, 43, 48), and 2 assessed the effectiveness of a combination of splints and exercises (15, 49). Six studies compared splints of different design (42, 44–47, 49), and 3 studies included a control group that did not use any splint (14, 17, 45). Two of the exercise studies compared exercise versus treatment as usual (43, 48), while the third exercise study compared exercise with a sham hand cream (16).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 2 studies combining splints and exercises, 1 compared 1 splint and exercise program with another splint and exercise program (49), while the other compared different doses of splints and exercises (15). Participants in all but 3 studies (43, 44, 48) had radiograph‐documented OA of the CMC1, and in 4 studies, participants with stage 4 OA were excluded (17, 46, 47, 49). Of the included studies, 9 had a high risk of bias (15, 42–49), 1 had a moderate risk (16), while 2 had a low risk of bias (14, 17).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations