2012
DOI: 10.1177/1468794111432992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A move to more systematic and transparent approaches in qualitative evidence synthesis: update on a review of published papers

Abstract: In 2007, the journal Qualitative Research published a review on qualitative evidence syntheses conducted between 1988 and 2004. It reported on the lack of explicit detail regarding methods for searching, appraisal and synthesis, and a lack of emerging consensus on these issues. We present an update of this review for the period 2005-8. Not only has the amount of published qualitative evidence syntheses doubled, but authors have also become more transparent about their searching and critical appraisal procedure… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
321
0
8

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 234 publications
(332 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
321
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The process of translation, through the development of descriptive and analytical themes, can be carried out in a rigorous way that facilitates transparency of reporting. 53,54,74 Some may argue against thematic synthesis, as the findings of individual studies can be decontextualized and the concepts identified in 1 setting may not be applicable to others. However, reviewers are able to transfer themes from 1 situation and can check that each transfer is valid.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process of translation, through the development of descriptive and analytical themes, can be carried out in a rigorous way that facilitates transparency of reporting. 53,54,74 Some may argue against thematic synthesis, as the findings of individual studies can be decontextualized and the concepts identified in 1 setting may not be applicable to others. However, reviewers are able to transfer themes from 1 situation and can check that each transfer is valid.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose this meta-ethnography method as it is an approach designed with the purpose of constructing theory (Campbell et al, 2003). Moreover, it is one of the most frequently used methods in systematic reviews of healthcare literature (Hannes & Macaitis, 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two team members appraised all papers, and if they did not reach an agreement sent the paper to two other team members for a decision. We used the methods of meta-ethnography [22] to synthesise the data [23][24][25]. Central to meta-ethnography is identifying key ideas or 'concepts' and comparing these concepts across studies [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%